This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2017 October 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Perez (football)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without rationale. Does not meet WP:NCOLLATH, and searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Recreated 06:10, 19 February 2017‎ as Luis Perez (American football), and Luis Perez (football) turned into a redirect. I have added the ((la)) above, and added a ((subst:afd1|Luis Perez (football))) to Luis Perez (American football). — Sam Sailor 10:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 10:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 10:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hi Sam Sailor - not sure what happened, but the American football article is up, but the redirect didn't work. The "redirect" appeared at the top of the article, but didn't work as a redirect. You might want to look at it again. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected, the user added a redirect to the top of the article and retained the text, so it looked like this, thanks onel5969. In any case I think we are going to handle the situation, to put it simple we just have a duplicating article at Luis Perez (American football) which maybe is the better DAB anyway. Cheers, — Sam Sailor 13:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please Take administrative action first (I see two articles on the same subject) and let me know when and if we should re-evaluate the article for inclusion or deletion. I suggest we leave the administrative action to be decided by those already looking at it and then have them let us know when to come back.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Northamerica1000 - Sorry to bug you, but could you take a look at this? Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:10, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I may not become involved in researching this matter; working on other things at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable college football player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per WP:DEL8, doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH. — Sam Sailor 10:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Luis Perez is notable because he is the first Mexican-American quarterback in NCAA history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosp14619 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yeah, no. Mark Sanchez, anyone? Ejgreen77 (talk) 23:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for not meeting WP:GNG or WP:NCOLLATH yet; it looks like he's bee nominated for a national award and is considered a likely professional prospect, so if one of those things happens, then the article could e recreated. Per above: if indeed he is notable for being "the first Mexican-American quarterback in NCAA history," then there should be significant coverage of that fact; if not, then it doesn't meet WP's guidelines. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Why does Dakota Prukop have a wikipedia page if he has no national awards and isn't as significant as Luis Perez? Carlosp14619 (talk) 23:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NCOLLATH and WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.