Marco Aponte

Marco Aponte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created and maintained by a homonymous account. As an academic and assistant professor, subject does not pass WP:PROF, and as an actor WP:NACTOR is not met. Generally only passing mentions in sources, no significant coverage has been found, so WP:BASIC/WP:GNG is not met either. (Two related articles are being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Moreno de Aponte (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actors of the World.) Sam Sailor 07:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article has been active for almost ten years. It should not be deleted. As an academic, the subject published a book and has written dozens of articles on the current economic and political situation in Venezuela. He has also been interviewed in various prominent media outlets, including the BBC. As an actor, he has worked extensively in the theater. There are countless of reviews on the internet on his theater work. He was also an actor in Scorsese's movie Hugo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:400:52F7:31B5:B5A6:97FC:1B40 (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
— 2601:644:400:52F7:31B5:B5A6:97FC:1B40 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Disruptively attempting to circumvent this discussion by repeatedly removing the AfD template from the article will:

• not work
• not increase your chances of keeping the article.

Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@[Sam Sailor|Sailor] Thank you very much for your suggestion to delete this page. I am the subject featured in it and do not want to have this page. I guess this is all my fault because I created it. However, that was ten years ago. I have tried unsuccessfully to delete the content in the past but the system brings it back, so I have been updating it as everyone who googles me (including students, audience members, reviewers, future employers) can see it. So please delete it as soon as possible. Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcoaponte (talk • contribs) 20:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Salt Subject isn't notable and we ought to prevent further problems by ensuring it can't be recreated. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:04, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doesn't a BLP policy apply here? Since the subject does not want the article or hypothetically declares it isn't accurate, can it apply for speedy deletion? --Jamez42 (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • ​WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE could come into play, but if the SPA IP "keep" votes are discounted, and they should, as they are not policy based, then there is little doubt about the outcome. Sam Sailor 18:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article should be kept regardless of how the subject feels about it. There is enough notability.67.164.93.195 (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC) — 67.164.93.195 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep This article should be kept regardless of how the subject feels about it. There is enough notability.67.164.93.195 (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC) — 67.164.93.195 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep immediately For example, he is noted in Hugo_(film) as an actor, people will search this actor's information or go tpo a media database or encyclopedia. If this is an encyclopedia of only very popular actors, it is ok to remove. Note: there is an entry in IMDB too because that is regarded as information (ref: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4263854/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t20). Here, we are truely destroying the knowledge of wikipedia. And, I think the article should be improved. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And as an extra. Subject still seems to fail WP:NACTOR. --Jamez42 (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]