- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator Eddie891 Talk Work 13:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Mornsun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Electrical power supply company, lots of coverage but achievements do not meet WP:NCORP. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 23:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 05:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 05:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't quite understand the nomination statement. WP:NCORP is about coverage, not achievements. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein talk 05:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep due to coverage; nominator would do to remember WP:DIDNOTWIN, WP:NOTBIGENOUGH/WP:IDONTKNOWIT, and more generically that an otherwise notable article being about an unsuccessful or unaccomplished subject does not counter notability if it's been established. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Why is this even being nominated? Clearly the article is well sourced. You may question the validity of the sources because of their origins but that's a fallacy. The company may not have achievements but achievements, while helpful, do not equate to notability. Likewise, one need not be well achieved to be counted as notable. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 19:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.