The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Sufficient notability established to pass WP:NGEO. More work needs to be done to expand the article, but potential sources (see Google search) do not seem to be lacking. Non-admin closure per WP:NAC #1. Hammersoft (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Gargash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-PROD'd without reason, the sources I could find were mere mentions, nothing significant to make WP:GNG. WP:GEOLAND requires that the "number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article" beyond mere statistics. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is the location of the Iranian National Observatory, according to [1]. MB 22:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Keep as we have always considered geographic locations as notable as we would for any other places, there's no serious basis for deletion as any debatable concerns can easily be improved; if sourcing is a serious issue, we dig deeper including considering the highly likely chance of unavailable online sources. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No reason required for deprod. Mountains (named natural features) are generally notable and there doesn't seem to be a verification issue here. ~Kvng (talk) 16:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GEOLAND. Andrew D. (talk) 23:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Davidson: How do you figure? Chris Troutman (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. needs better sourcing, but none the less notable and verified. DGG ( talk ) 15:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.