The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Naaltsoos Ayiilaa

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Original research. While I have little doubt that the article is correct, none of the sources cited directly support the claim that "Naaltsoos Ayiilaa" has been incorrectly credited as an author. Only through synthesis of the sources can we reach that conclusion. Since this article cannot be corroborated by reliable sources, it should not be merged elsewhere. Pburka (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well... somebody might look up this "author's" name... that was my thinking. Obviously, I should not vote here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 19:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There aren't any sources that cover this non-existent author, and the material is original research. -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The majority of the sources on the article are trivial at best and don't show any sort of notability. A search didn't bring up anything that would show that this is notable, either for the books or for the mistaken identity.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete. As per Tokyogirl79 and Fails WP:N .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.