![]() |
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Negative BLP that only cites one news occurrence, contrary to WP:NOT#NEWS Zzarch (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The main issues are listed in Talk:Morphological_computation_(robotics) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kakila (talk • contribs) 15:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage in reliable sources. One of his films, Mujhe Jeene Do, is notable, he himself is not. Since the film article does not contain significant information on Bhattacharjee (none with reliable sources, that is), a redirect would not be helpful. Huon (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG and WP:MOVIE. Bbb23 (talk) 21:35, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Prod tag was removed after adding a single link to an article in a local weekly news mag more about allegedly being censored than any alleged noteworthy achievements. To get an article in Wikipedia for an artist there needs to be more than local coverage. DreamGuy (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uncited material since Feb 2007. Borders on WP:OR. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 20:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable--no record deal AFAIK, no hits, no fame, no fortune. Drmies (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage found for this online magazine. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Reliable sources were added to the article, thus the delete !votes over the lack of them in the article are refutted. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage found. This Xbox Live Arcade video game fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Plenty of coverage , including a preview video that has been on Xbox Live http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Product/Haunt/66acd000-77fe-1000-9115-d80258410b34 Darwin-rover (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not every video game needs a Wikipedia article. — WylieCoyote (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is this really notable? If it is, it at least needs a major rewrite perhaps from a child dev. perspective. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 19:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never played or managed at a fully-pro level, so fails WP:FOOTYN, no evidence of significant coverage to pass WP:GNG ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
do not delete - many players on wiki have just non league careers, but do not have the professional coaching level like penny, and the article doesnt claim he did play pro football. he has coached at a fully professional level and developed many of the youth players in league football today. Published author of football books — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.86.230 (talk • contribs) — 82.33.86.230 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was merge to 1983 Grand Prix (tennis). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable tennis competition which only ran once. I cannot find any sources at all, never mind anything that could establish notability. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability. So, ONE tournament with no real notable tennis players for a tennis circuit that doesn't even mention Ferrara??? — WylieCoyote (talk) 03:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree that this event was hardly as significant as other major tennis events, but it was part of the Grand Prix tennis circuit and is counted on the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) web site, which I included as a source when creating this article. Additionally, I created this article as part of the effort of fulfilling one of the goals of Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis, which is to "Create articles for every tennis tournament for male and female players, especially since the beginning of the Open Era, including yearly articles and draws." For these reasons, I feel that this article should be maintained. User:Alexk785 (talk)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person (musician). Does not meet any of the WP:BAND criteria (for composers nor musicians). I did some extensive Googling for third-party references and found one album review by a non-notable online "publication". The only other items were typical artist-related profile sites, and a few archived forum posts asking whether she was a man or not. bllix (talk) 04:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The only WP:BAND criteria that the subject even comes within a mile of is "releasing two or more albums on an important indie label". While a couple of the other bands on Mental Ulcer Forges do have their own articles so are presumably notable (though that might need to be looked at...), it doesn't seem anything like enough for them to be considered a respected indie label. Given that the subject is German I suppose it is possible that there are some German language sources that aren't coming up in Google searches but absent any new info I can't see any reason to not delete it Robinr22 (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jujutacular talk 15:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. All the links are either blogs, don't mention or imply them by name, or are unreliable in some other way. While perhaps well meaning, it is bordering on advertising. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To the best of my understanding, the following references are "reliable":
a. Moorhouse, Ellen (2010). Trash Talk: Are those old videos just garbage?. yourhome.caYourhome.ca/ (A Toronto Star newspaper blog). Ellen Moorhouse was Editor in various departments of the Toronto Star, from October 1983 to December 2004 (21 years 3 months). During this time her various responsibilities, included: assistant business editor responsible for the Sunday business section; editorial board editor responsible for op-ed and editorial pages in the Saturday and Sunday Star, and real estate editor in charge of two weekly real estate sections. She has been writing the “Trash Talk” column for the Toronto Star’s ‘yourhome.ca’ blog since approximately April 2009 (oldest Trash Talk article I found: http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/columnsblogs/article/622811--trash-talk-don-t-chuck-it-use-it). According to Jennifer Wilson, Editor of the Toronto Star, "Ellen Moorhouse is a professional journalist. . . Yourhome.ca is not considered a blog, but a full-fledged site under the Toronto Star’s umbrella, and therefore fall under the same journalistic standards."
b. Wasson, Julia (2010). ReUse Connection – Ideas for Repurposing, Freely Shared. Blue Planet Green Living Julia Wasson has a distinguished career in marketing, publishing, writing, and editing. She and Blue Planet Green Living have already been cited as a refernce for a Wikipedia article. See reference #1 at: Harvard "Pete" Palmer, Jr. ("Donate Vehicle—Help Charity—Get Tax Deduction," www.blueplanetgreenliving.com, November 11, 2009, by Julia Wasson).
c. Tottleben, Cy (2010). The ReUse Connection: Keeping material out of the landfill. Mother Nature Network. Cy Tottleben, according to MNN.com (a blog that has its own Wikipedia page - Mother Nature Network), graduated from Indiana University with a BA in history. Cy has spent the past 20 years educating others on the three R’s — reusing, reducing and recycling, which has earned her the nickname of "The Crazy Recycling Lady." Her current project is affecting change in her business by greening her store and spreading these practices throughout the corporation. (See: http://www.mnn.com/users/ctottleben).
d. Grover, Sami (2010). [Reuse Community Takes Facebook By Storm - With More to Come]. TreeHugger. Treehugger is the number 1 environmental blog on the web and has a Wikipedia article (TreeHugger). Sami Grover has been a writer for TreeHugger since 2007. He has worked in academic publishing, specializing in issues related to sustainability. He has been published in Permaculture Magazine. Sami is the co-creative director at The Change Creation. (See: http://www.treehugger.com/author/sami-grover/). :Other publications by Sami Grover include: (2007). Rob Hopkins on Transition Culture, Positive News, and others listed on http://planetgreen.discovery.com/author/sami-grover/.
Ginalizardi (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ginalizardi (talk) 15:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)— Ginalizardi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable student club. No sources to indicate notability. GrapedApe (talk) 02:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found nothing that shows notability for this film. The only source in the article is the official website. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
notability? Steinhfer (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Georgetown University#Media. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Student run television channel that appears only on campus closed-circuit television and teh internets. No third party sources, as required by WP:N GrapedApe (talk) 15:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No reason why this software platform is notable is stated in article or could be found. Couldn't find significant independent coverage of this platform. Of the 3 references, it appears two relate to concepts peripheral to the subject and not the subject itself. The third is a press release from the organisation funding the product. Pit-yacker (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No significant claim of notability. Also appears to be WP:ARTSPAM - page creator, User:Kyleflaherty, has a vested interest - see [12] Bazonka (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Dickinson,_Texas#Education. There is a clear consensus, that a separate article isn't warranted for this school. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
K-8 schools have been deemed not worthy of inclusion by precedent. Relevant merge target is Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 14:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the ((R from school)) template on the redirect page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete - G12 (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 17:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Long-established precedent says that elementary and middle schools are not worthy of inclusion. Relevant merge target is Roman Catholic Diocese of Raleigh Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 14:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the ((R from school)) template on the redirect page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Nominator withdrew their nomination, and no !votes to delete were posted. (Non-Administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 15:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Has not made any professional appearances, so does not pass WP:FOOTBALL. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 13:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found zero significant coverage for this organization. The only links in the article are unreliable - Blogspot, Facebook, and Twitter. Fails WP:ORG. SL93 (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately this project would appear to fail the General notability guideline. As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Shirt58 (talk) 13:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Barely known playwright and politician. Does not meet any notability criteria in my mind. bender235 (talk) 12:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Redirect per WP:BOLD and per we don't need an AFD for that. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I moved the page to Abdel Wahab El-Messiri and this page is an accident edit after the move --AbderrahmanNajjar 11:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Gnews never heard of this organization. And the article itself has zero refs. This is the 2-year anniversary of it being tagged for deficiency in notability. Created by what appears to be an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 10:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:GNG and WP:NPLACE. run of the mill shopping centre with no coverage to reveal any notability outside the local area. Simply being the third largest in the region is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge with Sicilian Defence, Najdorf Variation. The concerns about the title are of interest, but given that it has been used I see no harm in leaving a redirect behind. Much of the content is already contained in the target article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is not clear whether this name of variation really exists, or whether it is just a name used locally in the Nederlands. Sources given are scarce and not enough to decide the name of a chess opening. SyG (talk) 09:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Twaburov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twaburov (talk • contribs) 31 December 2011 (UTC)
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article was deleted after an AFD in 2009. It was recently recreated but is substantially different to that version. Having read the sources in the article and looked for more myself, I do not think that the think tank has received sufficient significant secondary coverage for WP:GROUP to be met. The only coverage I can find is in news reports discussing what the institute has reported, rather than anything about the institute itself. While Julia Gillard evidently thinks that the think tank is important this is not the same as notable. Whatsmore, I can't find any evidence to suggest that the institute has had a significant impact on public policy in Australia, as might be expected if it had done so. SmartSE (talk) 12:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found nothing that would make this defunct magazine pass WP:N. SL93 (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article is just a plot synopsis with zero secondary sources to establish notability. Unless someone provides them, it should be redirected to the film article. Nightscream (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A meandering article that is at best an expanded dictionary definition, this is an essay with a notable(!) lack of references. It wanders way outside the topic of a customer per se. I have strong doubts that an article on the topic customer has any encyclopaedic value anyway. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 10:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No references to demonstrate notability and written like an advertisement Vrenator talk 09:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found no significant coverage. Non-notable magazine. SL93 (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was KEEP for Essam Yassin. Issam can be redirected there. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Fails WP:FOOTYN, hasn't played in a fully professional league. Cloudz679 12:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Where consensus dictates, editors wishing to merge content are encouraged to do so. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
more an essay than an encyclopaedia entry. Title refers to genetic defects but the body of the article discusses non genetic defects. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
“ | The first frogs with these genetic defects were found in the August of 1995 in south and central Minisota [sic]. The herpetologists believed that these were not any inherited defects. | ” |
The result was keep, without prejudice to possible merger, if further discussion supports such course.--Kubigula (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Person does not meet notability criteria. Being a member of the FitzGerald family does not make you notable. Tryde (talk) 06:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find sufficient substantial RS coverage to warrant a wp article. Others are welcome to try. Article written by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 08:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed prod. Doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria for artists or, specifically, music bios. ClaretAsh 06:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed PROD. Doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria for artists. Most significant claim to significance seems to be coming 2nd place in a single category at the Sony World Photography Awards. ClaretAsh 06:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He has:
Lopifalko (talk) 11:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a load of additional info, and clarified various points. How long should we wait to resolve this? Lopifalko (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The lack of coverage in reliable sources was refutted by Northamerica1000. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While this company does exist, from what I can see it lacks sufficient substantial rs coverage to meet our notability guidelines. Tagged for lack of notability and lack of refs for two years. Epeefleche (talk) 19:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(help)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help) (subscription required)The result was no consensus. Deryck C. 22:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This online magazine fails WP:WEB. I could find no significant coverage for this. The founder's link is just a redirect to a band. SL93 (talk) 00:32, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (Nominator also doesn't offer a valid rationale for deletion.) (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
machine translation of el WP article (CSD A2 plus bad machine translation) Steinhfer (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Halimzai. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Zero refs. Perhaps what is meant is the merge target that has been ignored for close to 2 years, but there is no rs-backed material to consider moving. As spelled here, it appears non-notable, but I've no objection to a redirect to the merge target spelling. Epeefleche (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Sindhi people for now. Any editor may restart an article on the topic with substantial sourced content. Deryck C. 22:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks substantial RS coverage. Zero refs. Tagged for notability for over 2 years. Also tagged as an orphan. Epeefleche (talk) 18:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The discussion doesn't contain any rationale for deletion. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AKS (talk) 04:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Typical church congregation does not appear to have the references needed to satisfy WP:ORG. Edison (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. This has been here for a week and nobody, including the nominator, has put froward an argument for deletion.Michig (talk) 08:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AKS (talk) 04:37, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. The nominator's opinion has changed from deletion to making this a redirect to Automatic Loveletter, which is supported by some other contributors to the discussion, but the consensus from the arguments put forward here is to keep this as a separate article. Michig (talk) 07:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced BLP Night of the Big Wind talk 02:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC) On request of Oakshade additional reason for the nomination: lack of souces that proof that she is notable as individual musician. Fails WP:GNG. Merging/redirecting looks a viable alternative! Night of the Big Wind talk 09:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help) Includes a biography about Simms.((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help) Includes a biography about Simms.((cite web))
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help) Includes a biography about Simms.((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help) Includes a biography about Simms.The result was Keep. Nomination was withdrawn. No !votes were posted, except by the nominator as "speedy keep", which equates to a withdrawal of the nomination. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 07:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article was deleted in October 2011 because a "search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements." I agree that she is not a notable politician, as she was only an interim leader of a provincial party for less than a year, during which there was no general election. 117Avenue (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We don't extend notability to volunteer fire departments, at least not regularly. This one doesn't have anything special, certainly not references pointing to notability via the GNG. Drmies (talk) 03:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Was not trying to be rude, sorry if it came off that way. Not all FD are notable but a quick search of wikipedia will turn up many FD, some volunteer. That was why I said it was incorrect. Perhaps the speedy keep was a bit rushed I admit...Zzaffuto118 (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)((cite web))
: External link in |publisher=
(help)Extended content
|
---|
AfDs[edit]Hey. I'm going to skip all the formalities since you've clearly discussed issues like this with users before. AfD !votes like this one are absurd, incorrect, and quite frankly disruptive. Please take some time away from AfD !voting and maybe read up a bit on how they work before you get involved. Thanks.--Yaksar (let's chat) 04:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] I take great offense to that. You have chosen very disrespectful language and the only absurd or disruptive thing that I see here is your message. If you don't like the fact that I voted keep for something, tough noogies. You get your say I get mine, leave it at that. And every police department article or fire department article I have ever worked on was easy to find a buttload of references for it, so that is why it is reasonable to expect them to have sources and meet the GNG. Also it is very inappropriate to drag an AfD discussion to my talk page, please don't do so. If I or anyone else feels like responding then I/they will do it here if not let it go and calm down.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comment- [66] Does that answer your concern?Zzaffuto118 (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Procedural note: if editors are going to mess around with the format, could they please open and close collapsed sections correctly and keep to the chronology. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Original research. While I have little doubt that the article is correct, none of the sources cited directly support the claim that "Naaltsoos Ayiilaa" has been incorrectly credited as an author. Only through synthesis of the sources can we reach that conclusion. Since this article cannot be corroborated by reliable sources, it should not be merged elsewhere. Pburka (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A loyal spouse and charity worker, but fails to meet notability guidelines, fails WP:BIO. WWGB (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article recreated after speedy. All but the last paragraph are corporate advertising, and the last paragraph is a blatant copyright violation. Otherwise inadequately sourced article. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Kubigula (talk) 01:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Closed in absence of article (speedy deleted as hoax). Peridon (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced and nothing on google to back up claims. Only hit with his name and Auschwitz is to this article. noq (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable book, 1,111,831 rank on Amazon, the author's bio was just deleted as nn. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about a non-notable footballer and doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. It technically passes WP:NSPORTS because Chiappa made exactly one appearance in Italy's Serie C2 during his brief career. However, the article was created in October 2007 and the only WP:RS I can find covering this individual is a San Marino Calcio season preview where Chiappa gets mentioned once. I'm asking that we apply common sense and delete this article because we cannot expand it further and this person has had the least notable footballing career possible that meets the bright-line test in NSPORTS. Jogurney (talk) 00:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 15:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
K-6 school. Convention with such schools is, as I understand it, to delete and/or redirect. Appears to be non-notable. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE for closer: if this AfD is closed as 'redirect', please remember to include the ((R from school)) on the redirect page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Essentially the same set up as Ace Baker which is in AFD too at the moment.
This person does not seem to pass GNG either. Google results are all SPSs, IMDB and lyrics sites. No hits in GNews.
Gbooks has a couple hits but nothing I would consider substantial.
According to the talk page, there was a version of this article that was a copyright paste from another site.
While this person seems marginally more notable than Baker, I don't think it satisfies substantial third party coverage. Noformation Talk 00:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article subject fails WP:MUSIC guidelines for notability. See here for specific details on what counts as notable for a musical act. Mr Pyles (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
K-6 school. Convention with such schools is, as I understand it, to delete and/or redirect. Appears to be non-notable. Was tagged for a merge one year ago, but no action was taken. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 00:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Whether a redirect is appropriate is an editorial decision. Sandstein 08:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found nothing that would make this software pass WP:N. SL93 (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]