The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National Coney Island (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local chain with no substantial coverage--certainly no non-local coverage. DGG ( talk ) 20:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - certainly the sourcing in the article could be improved, but my Lexis Nexis search shows notability (sorry about no links for easy reference). The chain has received quite a lot of press. Sure a good percentage is "local" in that it comes from Detroit, but coverage in large city newspapers (Detroit Free Press) is not usually what we think of when we say "local coverage". Non-local coverage includes profiles by Canadean, Zoom, and Lexis Nexis itself. The Toronto Star quoted National Coney Island as an authority on coney dogs and had a paragraph or two about the chain. USA Today listed it among the country's top airport food in 2009. CNN listed it as one of the 10 "airport restaurants that taste like home" in 2013. Several DFP stories featuring the chain have been picked up by affiliated papers nationally. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a large enough and noted enough restaurant to pass our notability criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Article has numerous sources. --doncram 23:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.