The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, more or less under criterion 1. The copyvio was axed by DGG, the page was moved to better target by TerriersFan, and tertiary educational institutions are notable. Everyone wins! Non-admin closure. Serpent's Choice (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Northeastern College, Santiago, Isabela, Philippines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article's title is too long and people might get confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncnians (talk • contribs)

• Speedy delete as copyright violation of [1]. The nom is not a good reason to delete; if there is a problem with the article's title, the title could be changed. But I take no position on that issue, because the copyright violation needs to be dealt with first. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I stubbified it to remove the copyvio. The title may need some reformulation, but all established colleges are notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
• Comment Just curious, aren't we required to delete an article once copyvio has been established, possibly under speedy delete, then recreate if it is notable? Something to do with the fact that the copyright violation will remain in the article's history, and you can't delete the history without deleting the whole page, via the license Wikipedia is under? Keeping it is technically illegal. Dennis Brown (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Administrators can hide or delete the offending revisions per WP:Revision deletion while keeping the article. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Ah, thanks. As long as that issue is taken care of, keeping would be the logical choice since it is a real institution of higher education. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the stub per DGG. This school is notable. A page move can address the nominator's concerns. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep All tertiary-level institutions are notable. Move to new title without the address. Moray An Par (talk) 04:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - all tertiary educational institutions are notable. I have moved the page. TerriersFan (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.