Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northeastern College, Santiago, Isabela, Philippines (2nd Nomination)
The result was redirect to Three 6 Mafia. Non-admin closure. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to locate any significant mentions of Crunchy Black. The article itself mentions that "little is known about Crunchy Black's current rap career but it is assumed he is still rapping..." This does not appear to meet the standards for notability, even though the group he was a member of may be notable, that notability is not inherited. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOT#STATS, non-notable. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy close, mistaken nomination. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free TV episode screenshot. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, not needed to understand the article. Fails NFCC#8, just like so many others. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete per A7. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non notable game TeapotgeorgeTalk 20:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page details the games of FC Terek Grozny football team in continental competitions. This team played only 4 games in 2004 in the early stages of the UEFA Cup. Games of low importance like these don't deserve such coverage. The results of the aforementioned games are already present in the article about the team, hence redundant. Maimai009 20:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable travel agency, which fails WP:SIGCOV: one source provides trivial coverage; two other sources provide no coverage whatsoever; claims of notability are still unsubstantiated. Mephtalk 19:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Orphan, Notabable for only one minor event, not a major biographical figure in Singapore, sources are mainly blogs and forums. Other dictionaries are better (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. (Closing early as per WP:SK criterion 1.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article is all original research and annotation. More importantly, I can find no reliable sources that this game, which I do not believe is well-known in chess annals, is actually known as the "Immortal losing game" (there are some Google hits, but they all seem to be Wikipedia mirrors or other non-reliable sources). Kansan (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of tis article does not meet the guidelines for notability. Juri Koll (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:45, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable individual lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. References are only passing mentions of the individual. Article fails WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 16:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uncertain situation about the notability. Multiple sources have been provided to verifiability is not a problem. Pitke (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Pell Grant. I'll add a ((copied)) for attribution purposes; this should have been treated as a merge. T. Canens (talk) 11:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Newly created article (moved to mainspace on 4/27/2011) duplicating Pell Grant. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by RHaworth (G3: Blatant hoax). Non-admin closure of orphaned AFD. Serpent's Choice (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Wikipedia is not a dictionary per WP:NOT Phearson (talk) 15:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was discussion closed as moot. Article has been speedily deleted by User:Athaenara. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
been tagged for cleanup for over a year, not cleaned up, opening AFD on this one as it also sounds like advertising. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 14:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article had previously been deleted because it was created before the event in question. The current article has been created after the event in question, but the event does not appear to be notable. Rather than a long term intifada, the event appears to have been a one-day protest (see news reports here and here). Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem to be notable. No hits in Google Scholar, one hit in Google Books that is not previewable, and no reliable sources turn up in a Google search. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Recently deleted by PROD and then undeleted after request by the subject himself. I'm not seeing enough significant coverage to meet the WP:GNG The-Pope (talk) 10:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral position: More notability would certainly be useful to defend this article, I am not able to vote delete due to lack of awareness of this persons contribution perhaps an Expert in the following star trek (sic) and/or the authors writing and/or the games critics side of things might advise, if this is worth saving? I have added expert and category Star Trek User:MikeBeckett Please do say 'Hi!' 10:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeBeckett (talk • contribs) [reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
PROD-contested by article creator. Fails WP:FILMNOT. elektrikSHOOS 09:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Biographical article with no indications of notability. Article has been recreated on several occasions. Speedy deletion templates removed by IP editors. Assuming good faith that this is not a case of IP sockpuppetry, I'm bringing the article to AFD. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Add:1 !vote only Dennis Brown (talk) Karimbil Kunhi Komen was a legend of his times. Almost everyone in Kannur and Kasargod districts of Kerala know him well. He passed away more than 20 years back. It's only through such channels of expressions we could connect him and his life to the younger generation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.93.99.98 (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ADD: Again, 1 !vote per user, please. it is a a shame that there is a discussion to prove the greatness of karimbil kunhi komen. he passed away in 1980s. the media wasn't as flourishing as it is now. i am from mangalore, and i share no relation with komen gurrukal. but my father had always told me that in life he should be your role model. i was lucky enough to visit the ancestral karimbil house. i just want to emulate him in life.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A candidate for speedy G4, but the nom was declined, even though this player still fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 10:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment re sports notability.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability. The references cited do not provide any substantial third part coverage in reliable sources. For example, http://www.wjdxfm.com/new2/featured/f/3115 says "© 2010 Barry Southgate", so it is not an independent source. Not only does the page http://www.frontiertouring.com/brianmcknight contain no mention of him, but using the web site's search facility for "Barry Southgate" produces the message "No results were found". http://www.theopenhouse.net.au/cgi-bin/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=barry+southgate+ barely mentions him. http://www.shadedblaque.com/blog/shaded-blaque-approved-the-melodic-sounds-of-barry-southgate/ is a blog. http://thecsperspective.com/about/ is a personal web site run by "two friends", and not a reliable source. And so it goes on... JamesBWatson (talk) 10:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. BigDom 16:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an entirely negative WP:BLP1E which seems non-notable apart from a controversy. Information might be mentioned in another article but keeping this inexpandable stub is dangerous. - filelakeshoe 10:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g11 as advertising for selfpublished book (note that book does not appear on Amazon or Google Books search). NawlinWiki (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable analysis concept. The concept of the Heuristic Triangle is only described in the cited book. The author can offer no evidence that it is used or even known by anybody else. Dcoetzee 10:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot see even a single reference of where this concept has been used, I am not sure as to how it even qualifies for a discussion for 'deletion'. Vinod.napier 10:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Minor late 18th/early 19th century banker. No articulation of why topic meets WP:BIO, no evidence of substantive third party sourcing. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 09:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Minor 19th century engraver, with no articulation of how the topic meets WP:CREATIVE. Little evidence of third-party sourcing. No biography in www.oxfordartonline.com HrafnTalkStalk(P) 09:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Nevi'im. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a totally incomprehensible mish-mash that violates WP:SYNTH, WP:NOR, WP:NEO ("nabiy'" does not explain or help to understand "The Hebrew Prophets"). What little is salvageable should be merged into the main Nevi'im (Hebrew Prophets) article as some sort of "Interpretations" section and not be a probable violation of WP:CONTENTFORKING to it. IZAK (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A standard linkfarm, most of which are red. Clear case of WP:NOT. Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 07:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article serves a purpose and the red links on the names will be updated once some of the players make teams and will have a page created. I am still updating this page so please do not delete. If you can make the page more marketable, please help but this page is very valuable during a very unsual time in the NFL. Thank you carthage44 Talk • 02:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a research paper that's been pasted into Wikipedia. Could be worthy of inclusion (perhaps as History of the French language in England or some such title??) but with the "Conclusions" section and the one reference this looks like huge WP:OR. JaGatalk 07:21, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I must say, though, that we will not find sources on "the different statuses of French in England between the 11th and 21st centuries". We may find sources for Jaga's suggestion, "History of the French Language in England"—so if this is kept, it would need to be renamed to what the sources call it. And also, removing the unsourced content would leave us with a tiny stub; replacing it with sourced content would mean a total rewrite from start to finish. Thus, if the outcome of this is "keep", then it's keep but with a different name and different content; I'm having trouble seeing the point, personally. Good luck with improving the article, though.—S Marshall T/C 22:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No Consensus to delete. In reviewing the discussion below I cannot see any consensus to delete. Opinions are split between keeping the article outright and redirecting to their notable product. Further discussion on the possibilities of a redirect or merge can take place on the articles talk page if anyone is interested. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable company. The article is only two sentences long, and it even says this video game company has only made one video game. OCNative (talk) 06:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the game The game is notable; the founder is notable. If the company ever makes another game, they'd be notable also, but at this point there is no real justification for an article DGG ( talk ) 20:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The individual concerned does not seem to be notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. wctaiwan (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
An junior athlete who appears not to qualify for notablity under Wp:athlete Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. Merge can be discussed further on the talk page, if needed. T. Canens (talk) 11:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails to establish notability with reliable, third-party sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Keep (changed after identification of suitable sources by Cenarium below)4u1e (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC) a brief mention to List of Middle-earth Elves. We don't need to keep the plot summary element of the article. There does not appear to be any significant real world commentary on this character - the references given above largely come about because more notable characters in the mythology are descended from him, so we get many google hits for the "descendants of Finwë", "sons of Finwë" for example. 4u1e (talk) 10:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: here are some Google links to the list by Colonel Warden with at least two important findings for the understanding of Tolkien's legendarium:
Apart from that one might even add a print-published slash fiction with Finwë as a character: The Silent Hustler ("Exiles", 163-177). That book itself may be non-notable but it demonstrates that the use of "Finwë" has gone beyond internet fanfiction. On that note it would be interesting to know whether the Tolkien Estate actually approved of Finwë being used in a gay short story. De728631 (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cenarium (talk) 14:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion.
The result was Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:GNG. not all power stations are notable. all it gets is 2gnews hits [7], which includes major Malaysian newspaper New Straits Times. for some strange reason, this article has a Norwegian language not Malay version. LibStar (talk) 04:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable minor league baseball player. No longer playing baseball professionally and only pitched a year (poorly) at Triple-A. References are WP:ROUTINE. Alex (talk) 03:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per consensus and per CSD G4. Not identical but close enough. No need for the salt shaker yet but I'll keep an eye on it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find any significant coverage of subject in reliable sources since previous AfD concluded "delete". Bongomatic 02:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep, more or less under criterion 1. The copyvio was axed by DGG, the page was moved to better target by TerriersFan, and tertiary educational institutions are notable. Everyone wins! Non-admin closure. Serpent's Choice (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article's title is too long and people might get confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ncnians (talk • contribs)
The result was WITHDRAWN (non admin closure). RadioFan (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
silly unremarkable fad. Any coverage has been in "news of the weird" or "bright" type news. Not the kid of significant coverage demanded by WP:GNG. Prod was contested with the entertaining but ridiculous claim that the fad is a "central pillar of Western Civilization.
Also nominating Planking (fad) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for similar reasons. RadioFan (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Elementary schools rarely meet notability guidelines for a dedicated article and this one doesn't appear to be much different. Claims to notability are ranking in state educational programs are interesting but dont really do much to establish notability here. Nearly every elementary school can claims sort of similar ranking. "Most improved" rankings in particular do not establish notability. Information on the solar farm is interesting but this can be adequately covered in the article on the school district. A dedicated article is not necessary Contested merge, bringing here for more editors to weigh in. RadioFan (talk) 00:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atmoz (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
LinuxXP was discontinued in 2009, all three 'external links' are no longer in use. It's essentially a skinned Fedora install, and not notable outside of that. SudoGhost (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable; appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:GNG badly. Yes, she gets a lot of GBooks and GNews hits, but those are by her, not about her, and thus do not satisfy the guidelines. Article claims she was nominated for an Emmy and a WGA Award for her writing, but this isn't true; she was a member of a large writing team that was nominated for a Daytime Emmy, and I can't find anything on the supposed WGA nomination. Article contains one reference, a marriage announcement, which is obviously routine and does not confer notability. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing notable about this individual other than he wrote a couple of strategy guides and was an editor of IGN.com at some point. Jonny2x4 (talk) 02:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Bethel School District. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable elementary school stub with no proper (independent/verifiable sources. Bhockey10 (talk) 02:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to school district as per standard procedure. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly a non-notable company/organization. I will do this for now rather than having the article speedy deleted. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 04:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly? Anything is possibly non-notable. This nonprofit has raised several thousands of dollars and has a very respectable advisory board. It is an up and coming tool for students in need, especially those in New York City. visit its website graymatterfdn.org and you'll see it is notable indeed. 68.174.254.72 (talk) 04:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)68.174.254.72[reply]
An objective source I found via google: http://stuyspectator.com/2011/02/15/with-graymatter-students-fund-student-matters/ I'm sure there are more Andsoad182 (talk) 16:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)andsoad182[reply]
Just delete the page... Andsoad182 (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)andsoad182[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Previously deleted via AFD and recreated. G4 declined due to addition of a source about the band's denial of entry into Canada. Subject does not meet criteria for notability in accordance with WP:BAND or WP:GNG. Cind.amuse 08:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. "looks funny and lack of citations make it seem like a fabricated folklore" is not a reason to delete, editing can sort that out - and there are references provided even if they are not inline. With the exception of that comment, the arguments seem pretty much equal, and as such I am closing this as no consensus, but without prejudice against a future renomination PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like this is someone's personal interest, neither his educational qulifications nor his positions qualifie for wikipedia notability. There are out there so many Commissioners in India. He did not have the right qualifications such as IAS or ICS government degrees required for the commissioner's position. This page is there with no merits. Sorry we need to clean up many such pages. 0ukieu (talk) 15:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on the 1st nomination: There are out there several thousands of people with such positions in India. The polulation is not critical to judge. Every State has at least on an avarage 200-400 disritcts in India. There are more than 20 States in India and there are more than 1 commissioners in each district. Indian villages are thickly populated. VH Naik as such has no publications. Yes, we have to respect his age and he is no more. But that should not be the criteria to judge. Someone in the family struggled to put up this page - Sorry. --0ukieu (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
--0ukieu (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
--0ukieu (talk) 10:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Staffordshire University. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable EchetusXe 13:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seemingly non-notable EchetusXe 13:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an unreferenced biography. In looking for references in secondary sources to add to it, it became aparrent that none appear to exist, despite the aparrently high profile career. The subject's own website, however, bears a striking similarity to the article. So this appears to fail WP:V and WP:N, plus there are real concerns about WP:NPOV and WP:COPYVIO. RichardOSmith (talk) 14:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Most of this information is fabrication. Much of the rest is unsourced. Even with the sources I ran down this article doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTE
I suspect this is an attempt at vandalism, self-promotion, or pranking. MTHarden (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article is NOT vandalism, self promotion, or pranking, We are trying to add more reference, but instead of spending our time writing in the references we have to spend all our time defending ourselves in these "talk" rooms. How can you say most of this is fabrication? Do you know Travis Tarrants? Do you have the newspaper articles backing you up? Or the television interviews? We do have them, and will be listing them. The Pantheon Theatre has had a page on here for 2 years and no one has questioned if it worthy or notable enough to be on here, yet the person who has donated hundreds of thousands of his own money to save it from being torn down is being questioned? Does this make any since? Travis has also donated thousands to the Red Skelton Theatre and museum, Old Town Players Theatre, and the War of 1812 Commission! Last we checked wikipedia was a nonprofit that asks for donations, do you think he will give to you if he is not "GOOD" enough to be on here? You write most of the rest is unsourced, like we said if you give us time we will be add more information and sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.14.209.19 (talk) 05:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC) — 99.14.209.19 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
This is Travis Tarrants. I was told someone made a page about me and that now there is arguement about the information on the page. I have read the page and all the information that is currently on it as I write this is correct. It is interesting what people write. First they said Im NOT an international business man/ millionaire, then in the very next sentence say they dont know me. They "know" this because they are from Vinncennes and know someone who "knows" me. Well Im NOT from Vincennes and spend little time there. NO one there knows my business there because I DO NOT spend time with or share my personal business or financial information with anyone from Vincennes. So if anyone from Vincennes says they "know" me as in know how much money Im worth or what all I do in business they are wrong! I already do business with China, India, Tiwain, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Canada, Italy and many other countries. I am currently buying a business near New Albany for 3 Million dollars. This company already does business with the above countries and I plan to expand it. Also I have been in alot more than Vincennes small town news as the above writer puts it. I have been in 2 national PBS specials. I have been interviewed by NBC, ABC, CBS, and, FOX television stations. I have also been on numerous radio programs over the years in other cities. There is currently a reporter coming from France do to a story about the Pantheon since Vincennes was founded by the French plus the two men who built the Pantheon had just came back from fighting in 1919 France in WW1 and where inspired by a theatre they saw there. Plus the New York Times is sending 2 men to take photos of the Pantheon and do a story about the Old theatres in America. The 2 men are also writing a book and want the Pantheon to be in it. So as you can see I have been in more than Vincennes media. If anyone has any more questions about me they can email me at info@pantheontheatre.com Thank you Tstarrants (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC) — Tstarrants (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Musician; notability per WP:BAND not established. The third party coverage in the article relates to a lawsuit against another musician, which is not enough for notability. To find sufficient sources we would need somebody who can read Serbian or Croatian. Until then I'd say redirect to his band, Rokeri s Moravu, but the redirect was overwritten with the current version of the article, hence the AfD. Sandstein 15:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails both WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG guidelines. Creator declined PROD but never addressed the concerns [22] -- therefore, this deletion discussion. There is no significant coverage by any independent reliable source and none was found on search. References are mentions of minor parts in cast lists. And dropping names of the starring actors does not transfer notability. This appears to be a typical actress with some minor roles at the start of her career -- an article is premature until there is significant coverage to support an encyclopedic WP:BLP. — CactusWriter (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No references. Does not meet general notability standard. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 20:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Prod by author. Prod reason was "Unreferenced Non-Notable Album as per WP:NALBUMS". Author did reference this, however it still consists of very little more than a track listing. Per WP:NALBUMS this should be Merge/Directed to Tiësto discography Hasteur (talk) 21:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I wrote information about the album from the references given so it doesn't stay just as a mere track listing page. Stratogustav (talk) 21:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
His claim to fame is that he inspired some lines in a Dire Straits song. There is a reference to a story in Q magazine but I don't think it is enough to establish notability. If its not delete perhaps it could be redirected but I'm not sure where to. Szzuk (talk) 21:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep all. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic listing of songs that reached number one on a single Canadian radio station/podcast, as opposed to official national charts with independently measured criteria. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:57, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]