The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PARIDHI[edit]

PARIDHI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event or festival. Mostly trivial mentions via blogspots, directories, listings, announcements or Facebook.  Wisdom89 ^♦talk 15:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Wisdom89 ^♦talk 15:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Wisdom89 ^♦talk 15:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as notable event covered by The Telegraph in news daily— Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.81.233 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 January 2016‎

Do you have a link or other details about this citation? ~Kvng (talk) 15:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm just not seeing sufficient sources to satisfy WP:GNG. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Could not find any independent coverage. Unable to deorphan. ~Kvng (talk) 15:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Can't find any sources suggesting that this may meet WP:GNG. A narrow search for "Telegraph" and PARIDHI didn't find anything either.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.