The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Palo Alto Lane Reduction Projects[edit]

Palo Alto Lane Reduction Projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a minor aspect of Palo alto city policy. I can see a sentence on it in the history of the city. this will have no discussion outside the city itself. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a trivial local issue, referenced only by government documents and a hyper-local weekly paper. If someone feels strongly that this is significant for the city of Palo Alto, a sentence could be added to that article, but there should not be a redirect; this is simply not an encyclopedic topic, and anyone wanting information about it will look in the city article in any case. --MelanieN (talk) 19:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While there is information about these projects, it all appears to be local in scope. I see no evidence that these projects are notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. A brief mention in the article on the city might be warranted. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.