The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Antigng (talk) 15:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Park Junghwa[edit]

Park Junghwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This member has no significant solo work outside of work he has done with his group so this page is not necessary at this time and simply restates information found on the group's pages. Furthermore it has information that is un-sourced or not notable enough to be included on a normal artist page.her Television series have been accompanied alongside other members and just has cameo appear but the music video isn't noteworthy enough to include anyways and her activity is less than دeed to have a separate page. in music videos. I believe the page should be removed.(Pikhmikh (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Keep - She is acting in the Korean TV drama as a Leading role, not cameo. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 00:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Looking at Park Junghwa's work as the work of an Entertainer per Wikipedia:BLPNOTE "Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities", she may qualify under #2. "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following," if failing the test of not having a "significant" body of work, or contributions, as either a musician or entertainer.

Looking at the aggregate picture, the group she belongs to, EXID, has WP page view stats averaging over 1000 daily.

And, including this English WP page being discussed, Park Junghwa has WP pages in seven more languages, with the Korean page having been created in April 2014, and a total of four different page creators for all eight pages. If the English page was perceived strictly as a "translation" of the Korean page, or any of the other six remaining pages, the value of their status as valid WP pages needs to be included.

It appears there is some significant "cult" following for Park Junghwa, being in a popular girl group, performing in fellow musicians' videos, and acting on television. I'm for keeping this developing page, which is a well-written (and as well-sourced as can be expected) representative page for any popular K-pop group's idol. If her career fizzles out, and the page with it, another group of editors can mull over keeping the page at a later date.

In general, it likens to the WP issue of the Wedding dress of Kate Middleton [1] and a lingering question about what pages women (and girls) find interesting on WP.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 02:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. 15:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Donottroll (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 15:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donottroll (talkcontribs)
See [2]. This link is the TV drama official website, she is definitely main role, not cameo and extra. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Choi Hyun Hee (talk) 02:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC) jeje1991, Choi Hyun Hee[reply]

Comment- I think one drama role can easily fit on the group's page and doesn't require she have a separate article.Peachywink (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Actually, listing for the first time--This discussion page was created without the ((afd2)) template and never transcluded to a daily log page for the perusal of those who follow AfDs generally. Fixed now--this discussion should run for at least another week before a larger audience.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Finngall talk 13:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  20:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.