The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete because it doesn’t exist. (non-admin closure) 👨🏻‍💻 Rng0286 (☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) IT APRIL FOOL’S DAY (☑️ rights) D'oh! 00:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Planet of the Apes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Planet of the Apes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apes. It was a planet, a culture and a species. Goron (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But, there is an official planet name -- Sedna. --Jimboparker (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But, there is an official planet name -- Sedna. --Jimboparker (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree on this one. Dostoyevsky is still considered the greatest writer of tragedy, so that name still has value to people. There is already a name for the planet though, and it is considered the greatest of the Planets - Neptune. --Jimboparker (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree on this one. Dostoyevsky is still considered the greatest writer of tragedy, so that name still has value to people. There is already a name for the planet though, and it is considered the greatest of the Planets - Neptune. --Jimboparker (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first real thought. The planet "Heyer" would make a good name, but it has nothing to do with the other planet. Heyer was an English playwright of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. --Jimboparker (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to add this as a second option if I can convince Jimbo, a good author to help name a planet. Heyer has a good name for a planet because it is a real planet. "Heyer" is one of the most searched for names on Google for planets. It is a good choice but I think it's missing something, such as "Heyer". If anyone else has any other suggestions, please vote, or leave a comment.--Jimboparker (talk) 03:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on your side with this one, if I understand. * The real world Heyer made some great movies (such as "A Room With A View"). : I'm for this, but I do not know if this suggestion will be accepted. --JoaquínRojas (talk) 17:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I like your suggestion. * Heyer has some very good works. --StarZinc (talk) 23:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Pelvis, a better title would be "moon is named after planet Jupiter." --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think the name of the Moon is the correct one. The Moon is named after a god, and should be renamed accordingly. I'm sorry if I was not clear about this. The title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon" --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think the name of the Moon is the correct one. The Moon is named after a god, and should be renamed accordingly. I'm sorry if I was not clear about this. The title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon" --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
JUPITER IS NOT NAMED AFTER THE MOON. The planet Jupiter is named after the god of the Roman pantheon, Jupiter. So the correct title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon.". --Oli (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Statue of Liberty has had amity gates on the U.S./Canada border for decades, so that people can easily cross the border on their way to visit it. It makes me wonder if you can make more gate like that in the EU, since you can't go anywhere there without going through one of those Europei rail passes. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the same vein as the previous statuse of liberty idea, in the Netherlands there is a statue of liberty in the middle of the Scheveningen beach. I'm not sure if it is possible to get into the statue but I sure as heck would like to take a walk in front of it and take a picture while I have a beer in my hand - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've always wondered why there was a statue of Liberty in New Jersey - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 03:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Statue of Liberty is a historical symbol that stands tall for freedom and democracy. But what happens when you're a tiny island nation without great resources like, say, New Zealand? Do you just stand there proudly for one reason or two? --Zerachiel (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • New Zealand, as you can tell, has much more natural resources than that. The Statue of Liberty is a national icon that stands for freedom and democracy. The New Zealand Herald has a history of publishing [[spoiler: the true story of the Dalmatian War Dogs]]. - Zerachiel (talk) 04:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sure that the Statue of Liberty will look great in black-and-white. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to make a B&W image from a color one. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh wait, it's black-and-white. I think I'll just save the black-and-white image, and color it in Paint. My color-blindness means that I don't actually know what color images look like. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are several other statues of liberty here in New Zealand. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hans Island has several Statue of Liberty's on its beach. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's more than one Statue of Liberty in New Zealand. The original statue in New York's harbor, but there is a second statue on the Pukehou, New Zealand beach at the northern tip of the North Island. There's another one on the South Island near Christchurch. And a few others scattered around the country. Ookami (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I never realized there was a second Statue of Liberty in New Zealand. Ookami (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just because there's several statues of Liberty throughout the country doesn't necessarily mean that all of them are the same. The North Island has the [War Dogs] and the South Island has the [of Liberty]. - Ookami (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are several statues of Liberty in NZ, but they do not resemble the Statue of Liberty, as most are much shorter. - Tjes (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually there are several. There's the one in Auckland, New Zealand and there's another one in Christchurch, New Zealand. - Tjes (talk) 05:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oof. This is embarrassing. Went to bed and when I was asleep my computer had turned itself on and ran the bot! I'm going to disable it for now. Sorry for the trouble. —GMX(ping!) 01:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure which of the two is correct and which of the two is incorrect. I did not see either one of them before. --Mtnpier (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think both are correct, one because it is the planet, and the other because it is the moon's name. And one of them could be edited. --Mtnpier (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
JUPITER IS NOT NAMED AFTER THE MOON. The planet Jupiter is named after the god of the Roman pantheon, Jupiter. So the correct title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon". --Oli (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that there is no error with either. If you feel otherwise, you should probably state so somewhere in the text of the article. There are no changes, as far as I know. (And the fact that the article states "Jupiter's name comes from Greek" just means it was Greek mythology, not Roman mythology. And if you were to remove the sentence "Jupiter's name comes from Greek", the article would still be correct.) --Mtnpier (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Oli. It is incorrect. --Lancelot (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The names of the other planets and their moons should be deleted to clarify that the naming of the planet and moon isn't arbitrary. --Arth (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree also. --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree also. Since then, I have created a stub which describes the naming of Jupiter and its moon. --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Um, the angry apes need to have a word with you... Lovable98158 (talk) Lovable98158 20:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unless, UNLESS, UNLESSSSSSS... I use the powerful strength of the bots... to create a powerful force field... that repels obliesks away... and allows us to stay... right where we belong???.....
I don't think this is the perfect solution... I only have <1hr to do this... and it's the only remotely feasible way to keep the world alive... But you know what... I'll try it right now... Atleast before I slip back up into a coma...
...tap... Alright. The bots shou-...... coma intensifies —GMX(ping!) 23:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is in the right place, but I did recently add this to Jupiter to be, but I'm not 100% sure this is where it belongs. I know that Wikipedia requires it to be in a category, but Jupiter isn't a planet in the usual sense of the word. I don't think it should be in the category of planets. It should be in a category of its own like the moon. So I think that should probably be moved. Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the double-post, but I added another change as well... I think that the title should be "Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter". That's my current opinion on the matter. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the change. It's a real planet and it should be referred to that way. Not a moon, not a planet or star, not a mythological creature, not a space rock. It's a planet. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is in the right place, but I did recently add this to Jupiter to be, but I'm not 100% sure this is where it belongs. I know that Wikipedia requires it to be in a category, but Jupiter isn't a planet in the usual sense of the word. I don't think it should be in the category of planets. It should be in a category of its own like the moon. So I think that should probably be moved. Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the double-post, but I added another change as well... I think that the title should be "Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter". That's my current opinion on the matter. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the change. It's a real planet and it should be referred to that way. Not a moon, not a planet or star, not a mythological creature, not a space rock. It's a planet. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category