The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RBH Sound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article that says almost nothing about the subject. In this case an audio equipment manufacturer yet all the sources are reviews of some (all?) of their products - mostly from a single source. Nothing about the company and nothing to indicate that it is notable. Any piece of equipment sent to a reviewer will get a review - these are not independent sources no matter how independent the reviewer. Article created by an SPA - looks like COI and possibly paid editing.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clearly advertising, fails WP:SPIP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate website. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.