The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ as there's no indication folks familiar with sourcing requirements want to improve it, rendering draft space moot. Star Mississippi 02:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redshine Publication

[edit]
Redshine Publication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. The references in the "publications" section do not even mention the company with the exception of a press release. I removed a reference that falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and unfortunately my WP:BEFORE search only finds more of the same. Nothing that meets WP:ORGCRIT and there is no inherent notability based on the books. CNMall41 (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the !vote. Being you have few edits and may not be aware of notability guidelines, I wanted to make sure and point out the relevant guidelines for notability on this article which would be WP:NCORP. Can you look at the section WP:ORGCRIT and point out the references that meet that criteria in order to show notability?--CNMall41 (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The publisher having a "track record of successfully showcasing the works of highly acclaimed authors" is not something that would make it notable. Please see WP:IHN. I will ask the same question I did to the IP address above, "can you look at the section WP:ORGCRIT and point out the references that meet that criteria in order to show notability?" --CNMall41 (talk) 06:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am amazed at the WP:SPA votes this AfD is getting, but I will play along. Wikipedia notability is based on sourcing, not your pursuit of maintaining high standards in publishing. Can you point to the sourcing that shows how this company meets notability guidelines? --CNMall41 (talk) 07:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: I acknowledge and respect Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. But a publisher notability just does not depend on media coverage. Indeed, the choice of a notable publisher by bestselling authors is a relevant point. My suggestion to draft the page until sufficient sources meet Wikipedia guidelines is a prudent approach to ensure accuracy and compliance.   Harishghona (talk) 12:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"a publisher notability just does not depend on media coverage" - Actually, that is exactly what it depends on. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to hear from more experienced editors. Also to see if there is additional support for draftification.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check sources and sorry for the delayed response due to a busy schedule
  1. https://www.mid-day.com/brand-media/article/redshine-publication-breaks-barriers-the-importance-of-multilingual-book-23284824
  2. https://haryana.punjabkesari.in/gurgaon/news/redshine-publication-india-headquarters-1813396
Meghapushkarna (talk) 12:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Before I edited this article there were no any references https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C5%BEidar_Kne%C5%BEevi%C4%87 , after spending some time I found some references and currently I'm working on this article's improvement.

In this article case, two sources found https://www.outlookmoney.com/outlook-money-spotlight/literary-and-author-empowerment-with-publishing-excellence-8913 https://www.sangritoday.com/redshine-publication-celebrates-remarkable-year-distributes-35-million-in-royalties-to-authors-in-2022-33

This article can improve...Nilarts (talk) 11:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing. The two sources you provided were just published and fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA which isn't suspicious at all.--CNMall41 (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.