The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rewards Network

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP, lack of significant independent coverage in RS. Refs are all primary, or press-release/directory type listings. MB 02:19, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nomination. Bukharin (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NOT - promotional, product lists, advertising. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 04:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 07:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete Promotional article with no significant independent coverage to meet the GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 22:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.