The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion or redirection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sinpu Ocean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a hoax. Miramar and Marine traffic returns no ship by this name ever. Google returns no results other than wikimirrors Lyndaship (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. --Pontificalibus 21:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. --Pontificalibus 21:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously huge ships, oil tankers and other tankers, are important in the world, and there should be sensible coverage in Wikipedia. There is not currently sensible coverage, IMHO, because there is no overall development of a List of tankers and/or List of oil tankers, which would correspond to existing Category:Tankers and Category:Oil tankers but provide actual context. A list can/should provide sizes of the ships and year of construction/launch, and utilize overview sources about the set of tankers in the world, and it can/should include redlinks where there are gaps. Currently there is no presentation in Wikipedia about this one ship putting it into any context; a list-article is needed IMHO to provide context. And then perhaps a bunch of the smaller stub articles (and even this one possibly) could better be redirected to the list-article, actually, to provide information in context which delivers more value to a reader than info dereft of context. --Doncram (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.