The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The article survived four previous AfDs. This AfD serves no purpose beyond disrupting the project. Owen× ☎ 16:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soggy biscuit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable subject matter per Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Current sources are still only an urban dictionary and a dictionary of slang. Quick search found not much more than forums and a few mock youtube videos. Section that attempts to establish notability completely unsourced. Calmer Waters 05:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 06:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. The term is clearly referenced in multiple, reliable sources that are posted in the prior nomination discussions, but none of these amount to anything more substantial than a definition of the term or references to different terms that resemble the described activity. In all the prior nominations, no sources have served to expand the notability of this term beyond a slang term, and I have not been able to find any myself. This term is not likely to grow beyond a simple definition or usage of the term:

Wikipedia articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic, however, they should provide other types of information about that topic as well. The full articles that Wikipedia's stubs grow into are very different from dictionary articles. -- from WP:DICT

It is not appropriate on Wikipedia because it is unlikely to grow anything beyond its definition and usage. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 06:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.