The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Somatics[edit]

Somatics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic does not appear to have attracted a sufficient amount of mainstream coverage to establish its notability Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 17:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If the article is kept, and if, as is currently the case, the only non-primary sources are critical of the approach, then the article needs to reflect that criticism, while of course maintaining a neutral point of view. (Second comment: I don't see how the AfD is language-related.) Cnilep (talk) 00:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - has anyone examined the quality of the sources online? Bearian (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, before nominating for deletion. As an altmed topic, the sources seem to trace back mainly to Hanna, without much "external" coverage. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 17:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.