The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted per CSD:G11 as unambiguous advertising and promotion. – Athaenara ✉ 09:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Songxinping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable. It says he published a "thesis" in 2017 but where? All references (they are all identical except for Ref 5), as well as this one in English appear to be self-published. Timmyshin (talk) 20:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep,His thesis is "3D Prostate Targeted Treatment" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.230.104.156 (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC) — 42.230.104.156 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Where was it published? I already know the answer: online. Timmyshin (talk) 02:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable commercial advertising. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete, does not meet WP:PROF which is the relevant notability guideline. The article is mainly about the claims in his (also non-notable) dissertation and not about the person. Publishing a doctoral thesis (in print, or through other means) is not a claim to notability on Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 06:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep,I've heard of this man,Read his report.Tootooyirenw (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC). — Tootooyirenw (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Keep,It comes from Ease, Sina, Tencent.And the content of the paper is very meaningful,so I mean to keep it.Renairenxiang (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC). — Renairenxiang (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Note: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liangshansan has been started for the two WP:SPA keep-voters. Cabayi (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Two lines of biography that takes a 90° turn and becomes an opportunity to re-publish the subject's WP:OR on Prostate therapy. Not a notable person. No clear topic (is it the person or the research). Cabayi (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Checkuser note: Tootooyirenw and Renairenxiang are  Confirmed sock puppets. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanshengsans.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete apparently-fringe practitioner of herbal cancer treatments with no evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable researcher working in fringe science. No sources to pass WP:GNG. — Stringy Acid (talk) 18:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.