The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow close/speedy delete as non-notable spam attempt. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwanese rice pudding cup

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an advert, and topic is not notable. User appears to be creating various similar articles of a promotional nature and linking to the same product page on Facebook. Parkywiki (talk) 23:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I find no reliable sources supporting the existence, much less the notability, of this item. Fails WP:GNG. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.