The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Traditional Chinese medicine. Can be userfied for improvement via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 08:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional Chinese veterinary medicine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be promoting alternative TCM therapies for veterinary medicine without any sources (never mind reliable ones) to back up claims. Not the view of most veterinarians and seems like an example of soapboxing. Bangalamania (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit) This fringe practice may have a place on the main traditional Chinese medicine article, with this page as a redirect. --Bangalamania (talk) 19:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Bangalamania (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep based on availability of a fair number of high quality sources [1]. However, would suggest redirecting to traditional Chinese medicine as an interim measure until someone actually does the work and makes use of them. We should not have unsourced articles on medical topics sit in mainspace, even if it's traditional Chinese medicine. Alternatively, draftify until sourced. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I haven't accessed a lot of those sources, but a lot of them seem to be focused on Veterinary acupuncture, which already has its article. --Bangalamania (talk) 20:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per above. Reywas92^Talk 17:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. At first I thought it was a fringe concept, but upon further investigation I added a few reliable source links to the external link section. I still think much or even most of traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is poor/bad medicine based on the scientific reviews of this type of medicine, nevertheless TCM and Traditional Chinese veterinary medicine both appear to have a significant followings in China.Knox490 (talk) 06:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep agree with Knox490. Cape Diamond MM (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect or delete per nom. JoelleJay (talk) 19:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect or delete this would need a thorough rewrite it's current incarnation is unsalvagable. It is better to nuke this and send it into the fires of Mount Doom. Then if someone wants to recreate they can go through AFC to ensure article is okay. PainProf (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.