The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Person who, if he can be considered to be known at all, is only known for one thing, and that thing already has its own article. At best this is only worth a redirect, but then I don't think the place it would redirect to necessarily deserves to have a Wikipdia article either. Only sources cited either fail WP:RS rules or do not demonstrate notability for a Wikipedia article because of trivial coverage.
And, hell, haven't looked but you'd think with a generic name like Travis Gordon some other random Travis Gordon is bound to be more notable than this person. Four short articles in local newspapers would be more sources and coverage that this guy. Maybe some schoolboard member somewhere objecting to the sale of cookies with peanuts in them at bake sales because of the risk of allergens got quoted five times and would bump this guy.
Vanityspamcruft. DreamGuy (talk) 01:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]