The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 23:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Violence against men[edit]

Violence against men (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was redirected to domestic violence which is a rather silly redirect. Article is empty. There could be an article here but at present there's not. Mystylplx (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how you can put all instances of violence when the victim happened to be a man or men together.Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The same way you can put all instances of violence when the victim happens to be a woman together. See Violence against women. There are LOTS of examples of institutionalized violence specifically directed against males, including gendercides and pretty much every war that's ever been fought. But that's not the point here. I'm not planning on writing such an article any time soon. I just think that leaving this article here with a redirect to Domestic violence is silly. Most sources say that domestic violence is one of the few types of violence that is more often directed at women. Redirecting violence against men to domestic violence is senseless. Plus, as I stated, the majority in the first AfD were for deletion. Not sure how it ended up redirected in such a silly way. Mystylplx (talk) 16:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If the article is to stay and simply be redirected then it should be redirected to something more appropriate, like War. Mystylplx (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.