The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Widow * Second Wife: Real Sucking Engulfing a Rare Utensil[edit]

Widow * Second Wife: Real Sucking Engulfing a Rare Utensil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing on an unremarkable film. The article went through an AfD (with a 'no consensus' result) but is not better for it -- there's no encyclopedically relevant prose as to why this film is significant or if it had any impact on the popular culture. The previous discussion included arguments on the overall importance of the genre, which is not relevant to this specific article.

Does not meet WP:NFILM & significant RS coverage not found. Please also see a recent AfD on a similar subject:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cousin White Paper: Aching Mature Lewdness (2nd nomination)

K.e.coffman (talk) 02:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Delete: Also of interest may be the links from this article to other such movies, which may not be notable enough and constitute WP:DIRECTORY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaleoNeonate (talk • contribs) 12:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed my comment to a vote. PaleoNeonate (talk) 14:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per my argument in the prior AFD: "fails WP:NOTFILM, and has no coverage shown in reliable independent sources. The Pink Grand Prix is a readers' poll conducted by "PG" (perhaps "P*G") magazine, a publication of no established notability. According to this news article [1], cited as a reliable source in the article on the award itself, "PG" is a "fanzine," or fan magazine. Reader polls, whether for print or online publications, generally aren't seen as establishing notability unless the publication is clearly notable (if then), and when they are, only the first place finisher is generally seen as having its own notability established by the poll. The film's article is sourced only to a comprehensive listing of produced films, which establishes only existence but not notability, and to the fanzine's own website, which lacks the independence required to establish notability". The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.