The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wouxun[edit]

Wouxun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted article created by a blocked sock, fails WP:NCORP criteria for notability. A WP:BEFORE search does not reveal SIGCOV about the company, although I could find some information about the radios, mostly sales sites, or on the company's own website. Netherzone (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, and China. Netherzone (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources. Wouxun does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Cunard (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.