The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Young Hospitality Professionals Summit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Series of non-notable events. Apparently intended as promotional. DGG ( talk ) 03:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all suggesting any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the event has been covered in such reputable media as Shanghai Morning Post (printed version, Sep 09, 2015), Shanghai Daily (printed version, Sep 21, 2015), China Daily (March 01, 2016), Hospitality Net(September 02, 2015) and The Hotelier Awards which makes the article valid in terms of applicable notability. Moreover, the author is not anyhow related to the event organizer/company, is not aiming at any sort of promotion/advertisement and acts purely out of the intend to help Wikipedia qualitatively expand. AnnaVdovina (talk) 06:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: YHPS 2015 has been covered in many social media, such as Hotelers, Hotel Zhang and 新华网 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juneziix (talk • contribs) 07:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Juneziix (talk) 07:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nb both AnnaVdovina and Juneziix are recent editors with no edits outside this topic.. Pincrete (talk) 16:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Literally no third party references are available to verify the information. The first instance of this event happened last year and only 1 source has a passing mention. Add to that the fact that a new account Evalema was registered to remove the speedy deletion tag while another new account Juneziix was created to vote "keep" at this AfD. This looks like a well coordinated attempt at promotion. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nb per Lemongirl's comment above, Evalema's edit history includes modifying Juneziix's vote!. Pincrete (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Lacks 3rd party sources. Might be notable one day, but not yet. Edwardx (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.