The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zhejiang Young Cell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously I had tagged it for speedy deletion A7 (organisation did not seem to have any credible claims of significance) but the tag was removed. Listing it here now since it fails WP:GNG (no significant coverage) as well as WP:ORGDEPTH. The organisation claims to have been set up in 2015 and I cannot find any English language links while a google translate of the references (in Chinese) reveals promotional language. Right now it seems WP:TOOSOON to have an article about this. Young cell might also need to be deleted as well (was previously speedy deleted but has been recreated as a redirect). Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I attached 3 sources and Google translation can not translate Chinese into English properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fu1475369 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non notable company. No search (English language) results in news or newspapers. Chinese sources in Google translation do sound promotional (Anti-Aging with stem cells?). The fact that it has a partnership with a notable organisation does not make the company itself notable: No inherited notability. -- Ben Ben ^(talk) 23:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches simply found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.