The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Cat had two entries, one of which was a stub that I redirected to the main show article per WP:FICT and the other of which is the main show article. No need for the cat at all. Otto4711 20:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Per precedent set by Hollywood Squares panelists. Otto4711 18:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Timrollpickering 03:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
rename as main page name.Viacosa 15:22, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Critics of Sathya Sai Baba. Timrollpickering 03:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from Speedy Timrollpickering 14:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus. Timrollpickering 02:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from Speedy Timrollpickering 14:58, 25 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, This category, or ones very similar to it have been deleted before. The link between the show and the artists are many times tenuous at best. They may have only been "in the studio" for a couple hours and this has very little to do with their overall career or who they are as people. It's categorycruft. Dismas|(talk) 13:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Timrollpickering 02:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Fooian brands" sounds so much less clunky and more natural than Brands of Foo, no? For the record, there are currently eight "Brands of Foo," (excluding one which I've tagged with ((db|catempty))) one "Fooian brandnames," and six "Fooian brands." See also Category:Brands by country. Picaroon 05:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Category is based on obscure figure-skating trivia. If we need this category, should we also classify the other 90% of skaters into another category for counterclockwise spinners? If it's relevant that a skater was a reverse jumper/spinner, can't we just note that fact in the article for the skater? Dr.frog 04:39, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, A list of albums named for colors is only marginally interesting, and interesting is not a criterion for inclusion at Wikipedia. Also, it's not clear whether the category is for albums with official names that are colors, or albums that are referred to by their color, or if the color should be the only word in the title. I'm not sure if we narrowed it down far enough, that the category would be meaningful. Freekee 04:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Unuseful, too narrow and unnecessary. AshadeofgreyTalk 03:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also I note that you linked to a guideline and not a policy. Otto4711 01:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 02:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Timrollpickering 02:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]