The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Being covered on a Kidz Bop album does not seem like a notable enough characteristic to deserve a category. Also, it has already been listified at List of songs on the Kidz Bop albums. --musicpvm 00:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename/merge to Category:Companies based in Tasmania --Kbdank71 16:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Category is too vague and subject to interpretation. JChap (talk • contribs) 23:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. --RobertG ♬ talk 14:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename, in line with the emerging standard for families. Sumahoy 22:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, This category is not needed and it only contains one subcategory (and no articles). There is an official list of Portuguese cities and therefore Category:Cities in Portugal and Category:Towns in Portugal are separate. Hawkestone 21:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename all (and I will create ((category redirect))s per ProveIt as happened with the US demonyms referred to). --RobertG ♬ talk 14:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the strong consensus to rename American city demonyms in previous discussions including Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 July 14#More demonyms, the following should be renamed for the same reasons: to be consistent with other city categories and to avoid ambiguity.
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated --Kbdank71 16:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 16:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Empty cat, replaced by more specific cats as discussed here. BaronLarf 18:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Orphan category just created. Confusing inclusion criteria, includes 9 people, a farmhouse and a ship replica. Doesn't really seem like a useful or productive category... what's next, Canadians who grew Turnups before 1975? Also possibly indirectly POV... since why else would someone be pointing out this little factoid. W.marsh 16:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium#Banned_in_California
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1937_Marijuana_Tax_Act
I think there were restrictions and state laws before the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937. grazon 17:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This category is very ambiguous. It just states "This category links music singles which have been censored." That would include ever song that contains a profanity, so I don't see how such a category would be useful. Currently, the only articles it includes are Frankie Goes to Hollywood which is a group (not a single) and the Censorship of music article. --musicpvm 16:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename/merge to Category:Multilingual songs --Kbdank71 16:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a trivial characteristic and doesn't deserve its own category. --musicpvm 16:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the entries for this category have been deleted, so there is not reason for this category to exist anymore. ISD 16:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Over-categorization. --Howard the Duck 13:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 16:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Over-categorization... listify. LimoWreck 13:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated --Kbdank71 16:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original WP:CFDS nominator: ProveIt (talk) 02:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename, The items in this category are not lists, they are articles about fish markets. Also, capitalization fix. --dm (talk) 04:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename main cat and two sub-cats. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. --RobertG ♬ talk 15:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]