The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: TTC stands for the Toronto Transit Commission, so the first Toronto is redundant and the full description should be used. --YUL89YYZ 23:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: British Asian is the term used in the UK. Chicheley 21:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was withdrawn - TexasAndroid 14:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Overly limiting, limiting to one type of character from Digimon. Also the category name is much more obscure than it needs to be. Rename to the much simpler and more easily recognized "Digimon characters". - TexasAndroid 20:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was relist Tim! 08:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It took me three attempts to find this. It doesn't match up with category:American culture. Chicheley 20:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only entry is the subcat Category:American manga and anime characters, which is already well categorized in the parent Category:Manga and anime characters. Overcategorization. - TexasAndroid 20:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. Vegaswikian 04:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page named wrong - recreated proparly (June 15 2006)
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
80% of the actors in this category:80% of the Brady Bunch characters listed are jokes and do not appear in the TV show or movie. The category is also unnecessary because the cast of both the TV show & movie are already documented in those articles.
The Category:Brady Bunch actors should be deleted for the same reasons.
The result of the debate was delete and rename, respectively. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The "by number" category should go based on a previous decision to eliminate category:Albums by number. The "First films" should change to "debut films" to eliminate the concept of numbers in these categories. (Or be deleted. I don't care which.)--Mike Selinker 16:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. Vegaswikian 04:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think this category is actually a triplicate of Category:Boston Bruins fans. At any rate, it's empty. BoojiBoy 16:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Wikipedian New England Patriots fans. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate. BoojiBoy 16:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Wikipedian Boston Bruins fans. Conscious 05:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate. BoojiBoy 16:11, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename all. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename Tim! 08:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody has already moved Montenegrin clubs out of this category, so it's time it was renamed. Conscious 10:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename per nom. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Moved here from mistaken TfD. --William Allen Simpson 09:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Wikipedia navigation templates and Wikipedia categories equalized with Wikimedia Commons categories Tim! 08:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another user category tree. Currently, there's no particular reason to have the same templates and categories as Commons. Badly designed with cyclical self-references. Certainly this isn't the best way to go about coordinating them. Appears to have recently done the same at:
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Broaden scope to include non-gradutes and bring in line with its peers in Category:Alumni by university in the United States. ×Meegs 08:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy deletion G4 recreated content by CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Needs renaming as "Britishs" is not a word. (I'm also not sure if this should be hyphenated) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 08:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think ethnic and nationality nedd two cat. There is Category:Serbian diaspora too. Matt86hk talk 08:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename all. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The large majority of categories within Category:American university presidents are titled "[University] presidents". The few listed below don't follow this convention and should be renamed for consistency.
jareha (comments) 08:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They are British people with Chinese descent, not Chinese people with British descent. It may confuse with British people lived/working in Hong Kong. And British people live in China is incresing too. Matt86hk talk 05:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete (empty). Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They are French people with Armenian descent, not Armenian with French descent. Matt86hk talk 05:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete (empty). Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I moved the only one article of this cat José Clayton to Category:Brazilian-Tunisians, because he is Tunisian with Brazilian descent, NOT Brazilian with Tunisian descent. Matt86hk talk 04:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A category is not the best place for a set of rumours as there's no way to source them in it; this could probably be listified, however. Related discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 10#Category:People alledged to be gay. Ziggurat 03:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At first I was merely going to send this to speedy for recapitalization, but similar categories use "Muslim". Sumahoy 01:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 14:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to match category:People by occupation. Sumahoy 01:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename Category:Boston Reds players to Category:Boston Reds (PL) players (technically, there's no majority, but important information was found by Meegs). Conscious 15:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 15:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contains only two items, both of which will shortly be removed per a recent unanimous decision on Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs regarding superfluous categories. Category was created by User:Elmo12456, who did not consult the team members, and only added the category to four pages (out of 800 genera). The group's decision is that such a category was arbitrary because diet of dinosaurs is speculative in many instances.--Firsfron of Ronchester 00:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 15:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is category creep. Eventually, the majority of templates will either incorporate at least a couple parser functions or become obselete. — Jun. 9, '06 [14:50] <freak|talk>
Additional concerns I have about this category:
— Jun. 15, '06 [00:35] <freak|talk>