The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 06:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC) relist as the category was not tagged. Conscious 15:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally nominated last month (see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 1). Closed as no consensus after only three unique votes (four if you count mine). Same reasoning still stands:
"Hip hop singer" is a misnomer (this is a group of singers from other genres -- mostly R&B and reggae -- who frequently appear on hip-hop songs - which actually would include 70% of all R&B artists, making the selection of artists inherently POV) - and artists who hjappen to record hip hop music and other genres as well. A category like this will only seek to confuse readers, and provides little factual encyclopedic value. --FuriousFreddy 16:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
My suggestions remain the same: either delete or rename to Category:Singers frequently appearing on hip hop recordings. --FuriousFreddy 03:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Keep --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Restore titles to Category:Science fiction films and delete. "Cult", in the context used here, is subjective, adolescent, derogatory and decidedly POV term. Category thus has no merit, especially with its proviso that titles cannot be listed both in it and in the regular science fiction films category, adding fannish arbitrariness and whimsy to the selection of their respective contents. 12.73.194.158 00:26, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to the standard form. I will add some more content. CalJW 22:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This needs to be renamed to the standard form for such categories. I will make a start on populating it. CalJW 22:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Keep --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
request deletion. There should be one article for Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest, and it doesn't need a category of its own. All the annual articles (very brief) should also be consolidated. Bejnar 21:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus. Conscious 08:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Grand Prix motor racing is empty except for Category:Grand Prix Before Formula One (which is populated) and I don't see any potential for growth. Suggest merging the GPBFO category into the GPMR one, since GPMR is a better name in my opinion. Recury 19:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To remove use of possessive "'s". David Kernow 16:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus. Conscious 13:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Fictional towns and cities in the United States and its subcategories have a rather unwieldy naming convention. Therefore, I propose that it be renamed Category:Fictional communities in the United States and its subcategories be renamed along those lines.
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 15:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal is to rename Category:Indian natural disasters to Category:Natural disasters in India. This would match all other Category:Natural disasters by country categories like Category:Natural disasters in Japan, etc. This would also match Category:Disasters in India and other similar categories. Kurieeto 16:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We have census data from the latest US census (2000 I believe) and a number of local census. But, even in the light of that
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The current name does not make it clear that it's for lands protected by the federal government only Daniel Case 15:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus to rename. Conscious 08:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm under the impression bracketed disambiguation in category names isn't Wikipedia's style...? David Kernow 14:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete (empty) --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only contained encyclopdic entry and list. Those two articles reference each other directly. This category is redundant. Avi 14:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All of the product articles are already listed in the main article for reference. Since the company is defunct, this category is unlikely to grow. Vegaswikian 06:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete (empty) --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Will never have more then one entry. Vegaswikian 06:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete (empty) --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
((Chevelle)) is substed on the category page, otherwise it's empty. Not needed definitely. Conscious 06:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was deleted. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicates Category:R.Q.Riley Projects, serves as an advertisement. Conscious 05:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 05:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore, and all buildings/structures are now in one of the former Soviet republics. Conscious 05:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge into parent Category:Hellenistic civilization. The "former" is superfluous here, since the entire "Hellenistic world" has that quality, as was mentioned on the Talk page a few months ago by Dbachmann, but no action taken. Half the articles are already in the parent, instead of this child category. --William Allen Simpson 04:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Speedy rename as apprev fix. Vegaswikian 19:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
U.S. → United States—Markles 04:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated so that Cat:Bismarck, ND will fit neatly into the U.S. state capitals cat scheme, and because the current structure is awkward Paul 03:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 06:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a subcategory of category:Spies, and so should be renamed to match. Not sure whether I feel the same way about category:Fictional secret agents and spies, though.--Mike Selinker 03:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete (empty) --William Allen Simpson 03:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It's only contained item is a subcategory, which is empty and earlier proposed for cfd.—Markles 02:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:DC Comics objects. Conscious 13:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC) I think the term is "things" is kind of generic. Exvicious 02:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 13:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The category is in simply need of proper capitalization as per the name of the honor, the Origins Award. ~ Hibana 00:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 05:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unneeded category with little potential for growth; exists mainly to promote creator's fan website [1] of the same name —Whoville 12:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]