To go into a bit more detail, starting with this category as generic "mind sports." "Mind sports" is a term already on the edge of notability. If you look at the Mind Sports Olympiad article, the vast majority of the references are "cute human interest story of the week," it's barely covered at all outside of England, and there are a decent number of dead links. That event is known more for cute silly stuff like underwater chess then the games actually in the category, and some that are there are there mostly as side events - e.g. poker. But lots of conventions / events / competitions / etc. have poker on the side, so categorizing poker in all of these categories would be silly. Neither I nor Google seems to have associated Magic: The Gathering or Gin Rummy particularly advertising themselves as "mind sports" (okay there's one off-handed reference to MTG & mind sports in a single column written in 2000). The most notable reference I can find to mind sports outside of a convention / competition billing itself for "mind sports" is this article on potentially legalizing poker in New Hampshire, which is nice, but not really enough. Because the term can be slapped onto anything by anyone, if we tried to use the "someone called it a mind sport somewhere" criteria, we would have to categorize texting as a mind sport because a cell phone company held a competition for fastest texter and then called it a mind sport. No.
If the category is seen as "games officially endorsed by a specific event," then the plain fact is that the mind sport competitions are way too minor to care. We don't have a "Games played at GenCon" category and GenCon's 41,000 attendance dwarfs the tiny Mind Sports events despite not handing out faux gold medals by country. If we used the World Mind Sports Games - the more "serious" mind sports competition - they only sanction 5 games anyway, not much of a category. SnowFire (talk) 01:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
I have checked these common usage of each of these terms on Google News and Google Books, and tabulated them all in a subpage, which is transcluded in the collapsed section below.
The table shows clearly that "women fooers" is more commonly used in nearly all cases. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Common usage data for women by occupation
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is a comparison of the usage of "women fooers" and "female fooers" on Google News and Google Books. For each occupational terms ("fooers"), a search was done on Google News for both "women fooers" and "female fooers". The higher number is highlighted in green. The search was then repeated on Google Books. See notes below for more details.
|
*Oppose women is the prefered way to describe human females.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC) already !voted above
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Male_nurses&action=history Ottawahitech (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:Political prisoners and detainees (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Political prisoners and detainees of Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Political prisoners and detainees of Romania (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Political prisoners and detainees of Hungary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)