The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Sharon Van Etten singles to Category:Sharon Van Etten songs

Nominator's rationale: Artist songs categories aren't split up by which ones were released as singles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Agree with nominator's rationale. Tame (talk) 07:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Cabinets of Lebanon. – Fayenatic London 23:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Lebanese cabinet to Category:Cabinet of Lebanon

Nominator's rationale: Should be renamed to be in line with the proposed renaming of Category:German Cabinet, and to be consistent with the rest of the category tree. Renerpho (talk) 18:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy rename per WP:C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I think it should be Category:Cabinets of Lebanon as it looks very much like a set category. Oculi (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The entire tree should be pluralized indeed, but that is not a matter of speedy. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  This isn't a speedy. Oculi (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree, it should be "cabinets" (plural). Renerpho (talk) 23:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename but to Category:Lebanese cabinets: this is a container for articles on successive cabinets. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @Peterkingiron: I don't see why. Category:German cabinet has just been renamed Category:Cabinets of Germany, for the same rationale, see here. Renerpho (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:People from Great Amwell (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:People from Amwell, Hertfordshire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: "Amwell" isn't currently an individual place, there is the village and parish of Great Amwell and there was also Little Amwell. Either this should be deleted or split to Category:People from Great Amwell (which it looks like most are for) and Category:People from Little Amwell. I have fixed the links to Amwell, Hertfordshire (that now points to the DAB) that I can by pointing them to one of the specific places but there are still 4 that I can't determine. In addition this title is also ambiguous as there is a hamlet in the St Albans district called Amwell[1] so if kept it should probably be moved to Category:People from Amwell, East Hertfordshire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as per nominator's rationale. Would not support alternative suggestion of moving to Category:People from Amwell, East Hertfordshire - if a category is needed for the people currently in this category it should be to the disambiguated place(s). Stortford (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  All 6 people left in the category are for Great Amwell so we could move to Category:People from Great Amwell or just create that from scratch. The suggestion Category:People from Amwell, East Hertfordshire is only if we keep using just "Amwell" due to the one in St Albans. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename/rescope to Category:People from Great Amwell and upmerge any strays. Grutness...wha? 02:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment -- The nom is right in principle. The question is what we should do. Does a place with a population of under 3000 need a category? If not merge to East Herts. Alternatively, we could retain the present scope as Category:People from the Amwells, East Hertfordshire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) OR split into Category:People from Great Amwell and Category:People from Hertford Heath, the parish into which Little Amwell has been merged. If anything, I prefer the last option, but I am not local and do not know. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Focus Entertainment games. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 06:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Focus Home Interactive games to Category:Focus Entertainment games

Nominator's rationale: The company was rebranded in 2021.[2] OceanHok (talk) 09:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• • Support company has rebranded and category needs updating accordingly Lankyant (talk) 07:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Republic of China (1912–1949) and Category:Subdivisions of former countries. bibliomaniac15 06:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Provinces of the Republic of China to Category:Republic of China (1912–1949)
  • Propose deleting Category:Subdivisions of the Republic of China (added 17 Dec)

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. (Note that Provinces of the Republic of China is a redirect to Administrative divisions of Taiwan but that is not what this category is about, and we already have Category:Subdivisions of Taiwan.) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Triple merge also to Category:Provinces of China and Category:Subdivisions of former countries. – Fayenatic London 10:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Fayenatic london: the subcategory is already in Category:Former provinces of China and I wonder if merging to Category:Subdivisions of former countries would be very appropriate, because this is about a past period of a still existing country. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I withdraw one of those targets. But Category:Subdivisions of former countries currently contains Category:Subdivisions of the Republic of China, and I would be inclined to construe the meaning widely. – Fayenatic London 12:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Upmerge both. Both have a single subcat leading down to Category:Republic of China (1912–1949), so that the two above it are unnecessary layers. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 23:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Documentary films about the Republic of China to Category:Documentary films about the Republic of China (1912–1949)
• Propose renaming Category:Protests in the Republic of China to Category:Protests in the Republic of China (1912–1949)

Nominator's rationale: rename per WP:C2C: Category:Republic of China (1912–1949) and per actual content, all articles are about the era before 1949. I did not list it at WP:CFDS because it is possibly controversial. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- I thought we had long since split content on China 1912-49 from that for Taiwan 1945-present, but these ones clearly got missed. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 07:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:The Late Late Show (American talk show) hosts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Propose deleting Category:Hosts of The Late Late Show (Irish talk show) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (added later)

Nominator's rationale: This appears to be a clear case of inappropriate overcategorization due to WP:PERFCAT: Performers by role or composition. Similarly, we don't characterize actors by performance on television series nor TV shows they've appeared on. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, delete. No merge is necessary. I have added the like-named Irish category which prompted me to create the American show category in the first place. – Fayenatic London 18:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment -- This is not about single performances, but about a long running role. I assume that the hosts are more TV presenters than actors. Guests on Late Late Show (either venue) would certainly fail PERFCAT. I had expected to find Category:BBC Newsnight presenters, but it does not exist: there are only long lists of personnel in Newsnight, ample to make a worthwhile category. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:El Sobrante, Contra Costa County, California. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:El Sobrante, California to Category:El Sobrante, Contra Costa County, California

Nominator's rationale: To avoid confusion between this place and El Sobrante, Riverside County, California. There was a RM for moving El Sobrante, California to El Sobrante, Contra Costa County, California, which I carried out. I also made a dab page. Natg 19 (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, as consistent with articles. The two El Sobrantes have almost identical populations at twelve and something thousand each.--Mvqr (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.