The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnic or national origin to Category:Fictional Chinese people by ethnicity
• Propose renaming Category:Fictional Brazilian people by ethnic or national origin to Category:Fictional Brazilian people by ethnicity added 27 October

Nominator's rationale: rename per actual content, the three subcategories are by ethnicity rather than by descent. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I added the Brazilian subcategory to the nomination for the same reason. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support per nom. Mason (talk) 03:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Fictional North Korean people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: delete, the category only contains a redirect. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's a ton of other categories for characters by nationality that are also small. AHI-3000 (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's a single redirect. Mason (talk) 03:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It is not absolutely necessary to replicate the category structure of nonfiction to that of fictional characters. Place Clichy (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Fictional characters by occupation and nationality. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Fictional people by occupation and ethnic or national descent to Category:Fictional people by occupation and nationality

Nominator's rationale: rename per actual content, the subcategories are all by nationality rather than by descent. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I would prefer a renaming to Category:Fictional characters by occupation and nationality, per long-standing parents Category:Fictional characters by occupation, Category:Fictional characters by location etc. People are made of flesh and bone, characters are not. Plus there's always that twist where a character you think is human for a great part of the work turns out to be something completely different. Place Clichy (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• That is also fine, none of the subcategories implies human characters per se. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Great West Conference baseball navigational boxes to Category:Great West Conference navigational boxes and Category:Great West Conference baseball templates

Nominator's rationale: Defunct conference with only one navbox. Upmerge. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: dual merge into Category:Buildings and structures in Shelburne, Vermont and Category:Museums in Chittenden County, Vermont. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster^talk 23:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Museums in Shelburne, Vermont to Category:Buildings and structures in Shelburne, Vermont and Category:Museums in Chittenden County, Vermont

Nominator's rationale: This category contains one article about a museum and the eponymously named category for the institution. No opposition to recreation if more more articles are written. User:Namiba 15:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional indigenous people. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster^talk 23:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Fictional indigenous people of the Americas to Category:Fictional indigenous people

Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer with just 2 children (Category:Fictional indigenous North American people and Category:Fictional indigenous South American people). Place Clichy (talk) 12:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional people by continent. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster^talk 00:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Fictional people of the Americas to Category:Fictional people by continent

Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer with just 3 children (besides the one nominated above): Category:Fictional North American people, Category:Fictional South American people, and Category:Fictional Latin American people. Place Clichy (talk) 12:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Thereafter possibly move Category:Fictional Latin American people under Category:Fictional people by region instead of by continent. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Wikipedia XX-Class level-n vital articles to Category:XX-Class level-n vital articles
• Propose renaming Category:Wikipedia XX-Class vital articles in YYYY to Category:XX-Class vital articles in YYYY

Nominator's rationale: I am resolving an issue which prevents the ((Vital article)) template being placed within the ((WikiProject banner shell)). Currently the class is not being inherited correctly, and to fix this I need to rename these categories to the more standing naming scheme for quality assessment categories. I have notified the project here and there is no opposition. There are quite a lot of categories which need to be renamed. I will try to list them all here, but not sure if I will get them all tagged. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename per nom. HouseBlaster^talk 02:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagging will be handled through WP:AWBREQ.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here are all the nominations in full:

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename per nom. Dpleibovitz (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename per nom. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: split. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose splitting Category:Fictional characters by gendered occupation to Category:Fictional females by occupation and Category:Fictional males by occupation

Nominator's rationale: split, it escapes me why characters with a gendered occupation are ghettoized in a third category. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Split per nom. I removed Category:Fictional engineers though, which had nothing to do there (it even has its own gendered child Category:Fictional female engineers). Also, a lot of categories are not for gendered occupations, but occupations where different words are used for male and female similar or equivalent roles: kings/queens, princes/princesses, monks/nuns, valets/butlers/maids etc. Place Clichy (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Split per nom. I am not even sure why some of these are listed (for instance, I am removing Fictional cheerleaders, which is not gendered). (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge all as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster^talk 23:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Superheroes by gender to Category:Superheroes
• Propose merging Category:Supervillains by gender to Category:Supervillains
• Propose merging Category:DC Comics characters by gender to Category:DC Comics characters
• Propose merging Category:Image Comics characters by gender to Category:Image Comics characters
• Propose merging Category:Marvel Comics characters by gender to Category:Marvel Comics characters
• Propose merging Category:Advertising characters by gender to Category:Advertising characters
• Propose merging Category:Anime and manga characters by gender to Category:Anime and manga characters
• Propose merging Category:Animated film characters by gender‎ to Category:Animated characters‎ in film
• Propose merging Category:Animated television characters by gender to Category:Animated television characters
• Propose merging Category:Fairy tale characters by gender to Category:Characters in fairy tales
• Propose merging Category:Literary characters by gender to Category:Literary characters
• Propose merging Category:Radio characters by gender to Category:Radio characters
• Propose merging Category:Songs about fictional characters by gender to Category:Songs about fictional characters
• Propose merging Category:Theatre characters by gender to Category:Theatre characters

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Useless layer. Place Clichy (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fictional sportspeople. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster^talk 23:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Fictional sportspeople by gender to Category:Fictional sportspeople

Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories (after the third has already been nominated). Marcocapelle (talk) 05:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Useless layer. Place Clichy (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster^talk 23:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Language and race (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Just 2 articles there (Racial literacy and Raciolinguistics), both about proposed concepts of a link between people's language and people's race, which do not seem to have a lot of catchment besides their proponents. Theoretically this could be merged to Category:Sociolinguistics or Category:Ethnolinguistics, but looking at both articles it seems to me that they are both already in the best categories for each of them, this one removed. Place Clichy (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.