The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 01:48, 26 October 2011 [1].


Percy LeSueur[edit]

Percy LeSueur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Nominator(s): Maxim(talk) 20:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Percy LeSueur was an ice hockey goaltender from the early days of the sport. He played for a small-town team against in a Stanley Cup challenge series against then-holders, Ottawa. One of the better teams in its era, Ottawa was so impressed by his play that he was playing for them nine days after his original team had lost their challenge match. As regards the article, I feel that despite being a bit on the short side, it is a well-written, thorough account of the man and his sixty years dedicated to the game of hockey, and consequently deserves FA status. Maxim(talk) 20:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - spotchecks not done. Be consistent in whether ISBNs are hyphenated or not. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, ISBNs are not hyphenated. Maxim(talk) 15:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyscape check - No issues were revealed by Copyscape searches. Graham Colm (talk) 22:49, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments – Quite a few things for an article of relatively short length, It's a little concerning...

Fixed all of the issues you listed, and then found and fixed a few more. I'm prone to skip over words when writing (or forget to remove a word), so I know what to look for. I fixed a bunch before FAC but obviously I had missed some of these glitches. The Toronto section was a trainwreck by itself; I don't know what happened there. :( Finally, for your point about "In both of his seasons, he had a losing record", I'm trying to say that he played one season for the Shamrocks, and one season for the Blueshirts; in each of the seasons in Toronto, he had a losing record. I've put "During his two seasons in Toronto, he had a losing record each year.", but it still sounds off to me... do you have any better ideas? I've tried a bunch of other ways but that was the best and I'm still not completely happy with it. Maxim(talk) 15:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Although a good piece of work and fairly comprehensive, I don't think this is quite there yet. I have just looked at the lead and first section and found several issues, mainly with the prose which is not FA quality yet. A quick glance through the rest of the article reveals many similar problems and these should be sorted out. I notice that this article has not gone through PR or even GAN; while this is not a requirement of a FA, it is usually helpful to have the eyes of as many editors as possible before FA, so that it is not only the primary editor who has checked it and these kinds of problems can be ironed out. I am opposing for the moment and these are examples only from the lead and first section; the rest of the article should be checked thoroughly, preferably by another pair of eyes. --Sarastro1 (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving at nominator request. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.