The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Giants2008 20:32, 18 June 2012 [1].

1964 Summer Paralympics medal table[edit]

Featured list candidates/1964 Summer Paralympics medal table/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:30, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it think that it meets the criteria. Thanks. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:30, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A few Comments

The image requires alt text, (an image of a medal winner would be nice too, understand though if none are available)
Refs 9-11 are not found (dartchery, snooker and table tennis)
Why are Ireland and Fiji listed when they didn't win a medal? This doesn't appear to be standard practice on any other wiki pages.
Why were there more gold medals awarded than silver (there is an explanation for bronze, but I don't see a corresponding one for gold/silver discrepancy)
"The Paralympics are run in parallel with the Olympic Games." the dates given for the paralympics are Nov. 3-12, while the 64 olympics were October 10-24. I'm confused about this (is it a general statement, or Tokyo specific?)
Why the link to the 1964 Summer Olympics medal table? Are the Paralympics really dependent on the Olympics? Do they not stand out as an event in itself? Perhaps a better link would be "See also: Olympic medal table" as is done on 2008 Summer Paralympics medal table or simply getting rid of it.
Dick Thompson doesn't appear to be the same one who won medals that paralympics.
Link United States at the 1964 Paralympics in the second paragraph (mention of most medals one), not the third (mention of Dick Thompson as multiple medalist) Ravendrop 04:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All Done. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 07:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ravendrop 07:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, looks OK to me. Dipankan ^{(Have a chat?)} 13:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose unless I can be convinced why this cannot be reasonably included in the main article, i.e. 1964 Summer Paralympics. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to tell, This list has 17 NOCs. Generally, if there are more than 10, we keep the top 10 in the main article (as in 1968 Summer Paralympics, and a separate list for the complete tally. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:23, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a separate list if the main article is even smaller than the list itself... The Rambling Man (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, 1968 Summer Paralympics and 1972 Summer Paralympics are also smaller than their lists, however both the lists are FLs. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as ever, just because that's the case then, it doesn't mean it's the case now. Let's see what others think. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Crisco 1492

If this was actually an IWAS World Games, shouldn't it be made explicit that only wheelchair users were accepted (if true)?
The paragraph with persons who won multiple medals should have a lead-in sentence, to improve flow.
Why is the information about the US repeated?

Also, I'd like to note (in response to The Rambling Man above) that just because an article is a stub now, that doesn't mean it always will be; should the article ever be properly developed, I think a full medal table would be too much on top of all the text. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm aware that articles can be expanded, but there's really no justification now for a separate list article. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Prose looks fine (although a more skilled copyeditor may find issues), referencing looks okay, I couldn't find any flaws with the table itself. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments – Really concerned about some of the writing I found. The non-free image in the lead doesn't have any rationale for this article. Even if it did, you don't need a non-free logo to help understand a list better, so it would fail to meet the non-free content criteria anyway. I strongly suggest removing the image, even if it is the only one avaliable for the list. "The Paralympics are run in the the same city...". Repeated word here. Not sure why three editors are supporting if something like that went undetected for all this time. Could move the Japan link up a sentence to where its performance at the Paralympics is discussed. "Athletes with outstanding performance included Margaret Harriman of Rhodesia won two gold medals in archery, Serge Bec of France won two individuals gold medals". Needs a full-scale rewrite due to a disturbing number of prose issues. How was this not found before? Could add "the" in "Dick Thompson of United States". "United States's Ron Stein...". Should start with "The", and the "s" after States' isn't needed. The apostrophe is still desirable, and is now needed after States." Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Medal table: Might as well use the NPC abbreviation here, since you gave it earlier. This wasn't done, but it's a minor point so I won't push too hard on it. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Reference 5 needs a publisher. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Forgot to say that it should be italicized. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Done. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 09:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Left responses above. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Done. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 09:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments – Really concerned about some of the writing I found.

The non-free image in the lead doesn't have any rationale for this article. Even if it did, you don't need a non-free logo to help understand a list better, so it would fail to meet the non-free content criteria anyway. I strongly suggest removing the image, even if it is the only one avaliable for the list.
"The Paralympics are run in the the same city...". Repeated word here. Not sure why three editors are supporting if something like that went undetected for all this time.
Could move the Japan link up a sentence to where its performance at the Paralympics is discussed.
"Athletes with outstanding performance included Margaret Harriman of Rhodesia won two gold medals in archery, Serge Bec of France won two individuals gold medals". Needs a full-scale rewrite due to a disturbing number of prose issues. How was this not found before?
Could add "the" in "Dick Thompson of United States".
"United States's Ron Stein...". Should start with "The", and the "s" after States' isn't needed.
- The apostrophe is still desirable, and is now needed after States." Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Medal table: Might as well use the NPC abbreviation here, since you gave it earlier.
- This wasn't done, but it's a minor point so I won't push too hard on it. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reference 5 needs a publisher. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgot to say that it should be italicized. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 09:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Left responses above. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 09:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I have to agree with TRM that this is a 3b violation: given the short size of the main article, this list could reasonably be included in that table. Until the parent article is longer, this can't be a FL, and if the same is true for 1968 and 1972, we may need to re-visit those and consider merging them into the parent articles. Harrias ^talk 16:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the main article a bit, maybe it meets the criteria now. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: This needs to be merged into 1964 Summer Paralympics, not promoted to FL status. Good raise 23:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Mainly because of the 3b criterion. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 02:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.