The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Superseeded by File:Bethesda Softworks Logo.svg Kungfu2187 (talk) 02:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free photograph of two naked women protesters taking part in student event, used merely for illustrating the fact that naked women took part. Fails NFCC#8: we don't need to see an image to understand the fact described in the text. (Although many of us no doubt would like to see more.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice picture of a mountain landscape, but orphaned and unidentified. Was never used in an article; uploader had no other edits (not even deleted ones). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image not really found on source. Damiens.rf 15:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given artist was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover (I remember about some TIME covers being considered public domain. Is this one of those?). Damiens.rf 16:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover (I remember about some TIME covers being considered public domain. Is this one of those?). Damiens.rf 16:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover (I remember about some TIME covers being considered public domain. Is this one of those?). Damiens.rf 16:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover (I remember about some TIME covers being considered public domain. Is this one of those?). Damiens.rf 16:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This non-free magazine cover is purportedly being used just because we don't have a better photo for illustrating the event depicted on the cover photo. We can't take the work of news agencies at our convenience. Damiens.rf 16:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given topic was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an unique, irreplaceable photo showing the meeting of notable hitoric relevant people, in what was likely an historic event itself. Nevertheless, we don't need to see the image of the event to have a proper understanding of the event. Damiens.rf 16:41, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Being Man of the Year is surely a big deal, but not the kind of news that needs an image to be conveyed. Damiens.rf 16:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given album was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given jewerly was on the cover. Damiens.rf 16:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free book cover for a book barely mentioned in an article. Damiens.rf 17:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free mugshot being used just to make the point someone was arrested. (aren't mugshots PD?) Damiens.rf 17:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This non-free photo copied from a news source shows important people attending an important event. Nevertheless, the text about the important event does not needs this image to convey all relevant encyclopedic information about the event. Damiens.rf 17:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free magazine cover being used just because the photo on the cover can serve as an illustration/decoration for our text about the event depicted. We can't use the work of news sources like that. Damiens.rf 18:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced non-free image of a living woman. Damiens.rf 18:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free magazine cover, being use just because the magazine (not even the specific issue of the magazine) is mentioned in a bio. Damiens.rf 18:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free magazine cover, being use just because the magazine (not even the specific issue of the magazine) is mentioned in a bio. Damiens.rf 18:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free magazine cover, being use just because the magazine (not even the specific issue of the magazine) is mentioned in a bio. Damiens.rf 18:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free magazine cover, being use just because the magazine (not even the specific issue of the magazine) is mentioned in a bio. Damiens.rf 18:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This non-free magazine cover is being used because it was one of the first time in history "that a publication was able to offer hour-by-hour photographic coverage of a disaster at sea". While this is an remarkable event and deserves to be noted on the article, we don't really need to see the photos themselves to talk about the historic moment on photographic coverages. What the boat looked like in the photo is not what make them notable, but just their existence. Damiens.rf 18:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We can illustrate the idea of censorship with free images. Damiens.rf 19:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free magazine cover used as a main bio illustration. Damiens.rf 19:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 19:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non-free drawing sourced to a imagehost website. Damiens.rf 20:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free image showing two man together. Damiens.rf 20:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 June 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A non-free image of young soldiers marching is not necessary for a proper understanding of the article about the FARC and its allegations of using child soldiers. The picture adds no relevant information. Damiens.rf 20:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free image showing the parents of the bio's subject. Damiens.rf 20:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image not found on source website (that was unlikely to be the copyright holder anyway) Damiens.rf 20:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
finagrave is not a valid source. Its contents are user contributions and it does not cares much about copyright violations. We need to know more about a photo before claiming fair use. Damiens.rf 21:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 June 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unecessary non-free image shows two man playing chess. Also, finagrave is not a valid source. Damiens.rf 21:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free image showing many people posing. Damiens.rf 21:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary decorative non-free image. Adds nothing informative to the text. Damiens.rf 21:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary decorative repetitive non-free image. Damiens.rf 21:30, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point a given topic was on the cover. Damiens.rf 21:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file, unencyclopaedic, Ronhjones (Talk) 21:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free photo of low use since it shows almost nothing interesting. Damiens.rf 21:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The events depicted on this picture need not an image to be properly conveyed in the article's text. The image adds no encyclopedic information. Damiens.rf 21:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need to see a tiny picture of a sign reading "FAGOTS – STAY OUT" to understand the discussion about the restaurant that once had a sign reading "FAGOTS – STAY OUT". This is simply textual information. The reader does not need to see the picture to visualize the matter. Damiens.rf 21:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary replaceale non-free pictures of a stack of guitar amplifier. Damiens.rf 21:47, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Beautiful non-free image copied from Getty Images. Damiens.rf 21:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image copied from Getty Images. Damiens.rf 21:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cliftonian
The original version that I uploaded in 2006 was a b&w copy of Smith's official portrait (a painting). It was used for assorted publicity purposes by both the Rhodesian government's information office and Smith's Rhodesia Front party. By modern standards, the image looks rather odd - but it is very striking and, perhaps, throws some light on the psychology behind UDI and white minority rule. I think it says more than the image that you have overloaded it by.
I cannot imagine that there is any copyright issue with my version. It is an iconic image of a deceased person and was widely used for promotional purposes in the 1960s and early 1970s. I guess someone technically has a copyright in the original painting. But whoever that was (and I suspect the Zimbabwe government), they haven't the least interest in it.
I haven't been active on Wikipedia for some years - so I don't propose to engage on the relevant forum about this.
best wishes
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not used. No info. Not useful. Damiens.rf 21:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free photo of some athletes at a very important moment. Although, the image adds nothing to the discussion about the event. Damiens.rf 21:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free photo of some athletes at a very important moment. Although, the image adds nothing to the discussion about the event. – Cliftonianthe orangey bit 22:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL licensing. Incomplete source. Orphan. Damiens.rf 22:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of GFDL licensing. Incomplete source. Orphan. Damiens.rf 22:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this low resolution monochromatic (almost) photo adds much information about the specific football fans riot it captures. Also, the source seems like a fan page that won't care much about copyrights, and this is the kind of image I would expect to belong to some news source or news agency. Damiens.rf 22:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 25#File:Userpage decoration for Redvers - Pictures.png Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free photo from Getty Images shows a wedding. Damiens.rf 22:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free image copied from a news source, show a woman on trial, used just to make the point she went on trial. Damiens.rf 22:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unneessary non-free image show the sad family of the victim of a crime. The image itself is not needed to the proper understanding of the text it's decorating. Damiens.rf 22:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free image copied from a news source, show a man on trial, used just to make the point she went on trial. Damiens.rf 22:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept - file is not on commons that I can see - Peripitus (Talk) 12:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 25#File:Userpage decoration for Redvers - Pictures.png Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File page used as an article Ronhjones (Talk) 22:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file, unencyclopaedic Ronhjones (Talk) 23:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file, unencyclopaedic Ronhjones (Talk) 23:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]