The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marie-Louise Meilleur, 1998.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

We don't require a non-free image of her, when multiple free images of her in earlier life exist. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as there are other free photos of her, and WP:NFCC#8 as the image doesn't significantly enhance the reader's understanding of the article. Interstellarity (talk) 23:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep unlike the images of supercentenarians I have nominated in threads above, there doesn't look to be a freely licenced image of her. If a definitely free image can be found, then delete as failing WP:NFCC#1, but unless that is shown, this appears to be a valid fair use. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LoveAndRockets31.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Knulclunk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The article already has one piece of non-free media and this isn't adding enough critical commentary or educational value to justify another piece. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP- The comic Love and Rockets (comic) was co-created by Gilbert and Jamie Hernandez. As each artist alternated cover duties, failing to show Jamie's work, style and two most central characters of the comic would be an oversight. This choice of using this later issue shows the evolved characters during the books heyday, the evolved logo and the influential style that would inspire later artists. The image is low resolution and meet all other criteria for WP:FUR, (small portion of work, irreplaceable, etc). Knulclunk (talk) 11:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:NFCC#1 as there is another non-free image on the article, and also WP:NFCC#8, as it's inclusion on Love and Rockets (comics) does not significantly enhance the reader's understanding of the topic. The use on Jaime Hernandez is blatantly incorrect too, as that's an article about a person, not the comics. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  KEEP Most significant comic artists have at least one cover representing their work and characters they have created. Yes for educational purposes that significantly enhance understanding of the topic. Perhaps if the image had a well-crafted rationale? I can work one up! Give the community a few days... Knulclunk (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom's rationale. The file is used on two articles: Love and Rockets (comics) (for which there is already another non-free image in the infobox and this image adds nothing of value per WP:NFCC#8) and Jaime Hernandez (which Joseph2302 summed up accurately as blatantly incorrect too). - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:1075TheOasis1992.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mbrstooge (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Former logo of radio station KMVK under a previous callsign. Not serving the purpose specified in its rationale (not helping the reader identify the organization, nor assuring readers that they have reached the right article). Current use is WP:DECORATIVE. Previously nominated 14-Aug-2020 which meant that my recent proposed deletion was properly declined. The decision of that nomination was Delete, but there was no discussion. It was restored the next month (5-Sept-2020), as part of a bulk restore of nominations some of which were not thought out well.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kencocoffeejar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dev920 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused derivative work. no obvious use. Permission needed if required to be kept. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A derivative work from what? I took the photo. Move it to the Commons...? Dev920 13:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see c:COM:PACKAGING. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:7 Squadron RAF.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H1523702 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Crown copyright expired in 1940. Replaced with higher-quality emblem at File:No. 7 Squadron RAF badge.png on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.