The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ‑Scottywong| [soliloquize] || 22:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Andhra Pradesh[edit]

All prior XfDs for this page:
Portal:Andhra Pradesh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Abandoned mini-portal on the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Automated then reverted to manual. A 6-year-old stale "news" page which is actually govt press releases, and a set of eleven-year-old stale DYKs. Few quality articles in its scope; WikiProject AP is inactive; no maintainers; and only 16 views/day. It has only 10 selected articles, just half the POG minimum of 20. (Yes, I do know that after 6 months of specifying a bare minimum of twenty, POG was reverted to an earlier version which makes even that low number a fuzzy target. But I hope that unlike the reverter, editors will exercise WP:COMMONSENSE and recognise that even 20 articles is a woefully small set to provide a decent sample of any non-trivial topic, and that a mere 10 is a risible waste of time.)

Created [1] on 7 July 2008‎ by Ias2008 (talk · contribs), whose last edit to any part of the portal was only one week later, on 14 July 2008 (see Ias2008's portal-space contribs). Since late 2006, the lead of WP:POG has warned "Do not expect other editors to maintain a portal you create", but Ias2008 did not follow that guidance.

Special:PrefixIndex/Portal:Andhra_Pradesh shows a small set of sub-pages:

This neglect is presumably why the portal was "upgraded to a single-page design" [3] in Sept 2018 by @The Transhumanist (TTH). This "upgrade" converted the portal into an automated clone tool, which drew its all its selected articles from the navbox Template:Andhra Pradesh, and made the portal merely a bloated version of the navbox, just like the navbox-clone portalspam which was deleted in April in two mass deletions of similar portals (one, and two). So in May 2019, I (BHG) reverted [4] the portal to a pre-automated version. That restored the portal to its abandoned state, from which it has not been rescued.

WP:POG requires that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". POG also guides that "the portal should be associated with a WikiProject (or have editors with sufficient interest) to help ensure a supply of new material for the portal and maintain the portal". This fails on at least three of the four counts:

  1. Question? Broad topic. Category:WikiProject Andhra Pradesh articles contains 5937 articles, but not many of high quality. The table in Category:Andhra Pradesh articles by quality shows only 4 FAs and 45 GAs. That set might be enough to sustain a portal if it included a balanced set of topics, but I haven't checked that. And it would rely on the other conditions being met.
  2. ☒N High readership. The portal's January–June 2019 daily average of only 16 views per day is very low.
  3. ☒N Lots of maintainers. No. The last substantive maintenance was in 2010.
  4. ☒N WikiProject involvement. No. I have just tagged [5] WP:WikiProject Andhra Pradesh as inactive, because the last discussion on its talkpage was in 2017. The project shows zero interest in the portal. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Andhra Pradesh and its archive show only one mention of the portal, in 2008.

This portal was created in good faith when active editor numbers were at their peak and portalmania at its height. But for the last 9 years, with fewer editors, there has been no interest in maintaining a portal on this topic, and almost no interest in reading it. Time to just delete it. Since the problems are deep-seated and long-standing, I oppose re-creation. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Portals[edit]
Title Portal Page Views Article Page Views Comments Ratio Percent Articles Notes
India 145 30677 Very many subpages, some of which are marked historical. Difficult to determine when last maintained. 211.57 0.47% 94 Jan-Feb19 views were 150/32278
Delhi 11 4490 Originator inactive since 2012. 408.18 0.24%
Himachal Pradesh 9 2219 Originator inactive since 2017. 246.56 0.41% 6
Uttar Pradesh 13 5157 Originator edits sporadically. Maintenance stopped around 2011. 396.69 0.25%
Jharkhand 9 1468 Originator inactive since 2017. 163.11 0.61% 13
Rajasthan 12 3388 Originated 2014; originator last edited 2016. Nominator states little maintenance since 2014. 282.33 0.35% 17
Maharashtra 13 4684 Originated 2006. Originator last edited 2010. Most articles created in 2016. No maintenance since 2016. 360.31 0.28% 11
Haryana 9 2469 Originated 2012. Originator last edited 2018. No maintenance after 2013. 274.33 0.36% 12
Bihar 10 2935 Originated 2008. Abandoned by originator, who last edited 2015. No substantive maintenance since 2013. 293.50 0.34% 16
Assam 10 2679 Originated 2013. Originator last edited portal in 2016, inactive since 2017. Very little maintenance since 2013. 267.90 0.37% 12 Article 7 has had markup error since 2013.
Gujarat 12 3471 Originated in 2006 and abandoned. Originator inactive since 2011. Articles are listed in-line rather than forked. 289.25 0.35% 16
West Bengal 14 3531 Originated 2006, updated until 2008 by editor who edits occasionally. Some articles have been converted to transclusion but others have not; maintenance is spotty. 252.21 0.40% 26 A tangled forest of subpages.
Odisha 11 2505 Originated and abandoned in 2009 by a sporadic editor. 227.73 0.44% 9 No substantive maintenance since 2011.
Andhra Pradesh 16 5497 Originated 2008 and promptly abandoned by sporadic editor. No maintenance since 2010. 343.56 0.29% 10
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.