May 17

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 17, 2012

Wikipedia:POLICYPRICK

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW delete, even creator is ok with deletion. Dreadstar 03:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure it was in the best intentions, but I think the name POLICYPRICK is unnecessarily inflammatory and isn't likely an oft used terms. To allow users to easily link it this way seem unnecessarily combative and incivil. Dennis Brown - © 23:26, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A valid point, however I would predict it being abused (i.e. calling people a policy prick) more than it being used in self-deprecation humour. If you wanted to refer to yourself as a policy prick I would recommend using a pipelink such as [[WP:WIKILAYWER|WP:POLICYPRICK]], or intentionally redlinking the redirect, which sometimes can have more of an effect than the redirect. --kelapstick(bainuu) 00:04, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I don't really have a problem with this being deleted, I just thought it was fun (; It does have high potential for abuse. BeCritical 00:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hated to bring it here but had to B, it isn't personal. I'm still a little leary of your other one as well, but mulling it over. I appreciate your open minded attitude about the concerns here. Dennis Brown - © 00:35, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about it, no hard feelings at all. Maybe I shouldn't have made it to begin with (; BeCritical 02:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blindu eusebiu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was defer to AfD. If the target is deleted (as presently seems likely), then this redirect can be deleted per WP:CSD#G8. If the article is kept, then the redirect can be renominated without prejudice if desired. Thryduulf (talk) 19:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Improbable redirect to an article currently at AfD, created by SPA User:Stopdeletingarticles, ... bobrayner (talk) 15:12, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Graham Pierce

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξxplicit 23:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. non notable person 2. redir creates need for superfluous hatnote 3. autobio redir Widefox (talk) 08:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Tafe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. — ξxplicit 23:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A double nomination. The term appears to be a derogatory characterization of particular universities in Australia — that they are only 'super TAFE' institutions. The pages have vacillated between various universities, and there are no mainspace interlinks; I cannot imagine any way to keep them. In my view, borderline CSD, but I thought I'd offer them here. NTox · talk 05:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vegetarian sausage

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Rossami (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am rather concerned that if one types "Vegetarian sausage" into the box on the left, one gets redirected to "Vegetarian hot dog". I thought I had better take this to "Wikipedia: Redirects for discussion" because a sausage is not the same as a hot dog - a sausage is just a sausage, whereas a hot dog is a sausage inside a bread roll. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 08:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Exobrain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Externalism, as the most appropriate target at this time. — ξxplicit 23:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deletion, no attempt has been made to establish what Exobrain is, or how it connects with the article to which it redirects. This redirect does not appear to be helpful in any way. Argey (talk) 04:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.