The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. No policy compliant delete rationale has been presented. In the event that this phrase is removed from the target at a future date then this redirect would need to be revisited. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• WhitesCantBeRaped → Hashtag activism (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

This seems like a completely unreasonable redirect. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Question Why? NotBetaFive (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I don't see the problem. It redirects to a sourced section of another article. Unless we think that it's an implausible search term it should probably be kept.- MrX 22:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: completely reasonable redirect, hashtag is discussed in target article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 01:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as R3 [non-admin closure] � (talk) 16:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• UkrAine → Ukraine (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not a search term generally used. No source call Ukraine as UkrAine. And this is not a typo that people often make. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 14:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete under WP:R3, as a recently created redirect from implausible typo or misnomer. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G5 (block evasion) [non-admin closure] � (talk) 16:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Cars 3 (2013 3D animated sequel film) → Cars (franchise) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Highly unlikely redirect. Created by sock of a blocked user. SummerPhD (talk) 14:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 冰岛 → Iceland (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not especially Chinese. —— TheChampionMan1234 06:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. Iceland has little affinity for Chinese -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Slovaquie → Slovakia (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 
• República Eslovaca → Slovakia (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 
• Eslováquia → Slovakia (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not related to any of these languages. —— TheChampionMan1234 06:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. Slovakia has little affinity for Iberian -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Templates on Wikipedia → Help:Template (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Recently created, unlikely search term, unhelpful. —— TheChampionMan1234 06:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: rather pointless XNR promoting the worst possible path for getting used to Wikipedia. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete XNR redirect to pipeworking, not for the readership -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• No original resarch → Research (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Unlikely search term if not referring to project policy, it is mentioned nowhere at the target except for a hatnote. - TheChampionMan1234 04:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOR is not something for the readership, so anyone linking to the current redirect expecting WPNOR, will be mislinked, and original research is something research covers. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: apparently this wording has no strong connection with anything but WP:NOR, and creating another XNRs as an outcome of RfD is something I would like to avoid. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: NOR is a WP policy. This redirect avoids violating WP:META by making no sense. We don't need it. NotBetaFive (talk) 21:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Violent Factionalizing Debate → Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

What is this supposed to mean? - TheChampionMan1234 01:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-neutral —PC-XT+ 04:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC) Ok, I see how this could be acceptable as an opinion redirect. I retract my !vote. —PC-XT+ 05:28, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment the former name for AfD was VfD -- votes for deletion , so this is commentary about the Wikipedia deletion process in the form of a redirect. (like WP:DRAMA used to [1] about WP:AN) -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: this redirect expresses opinion of its author about the process. I just don't see a valid deletion rationale. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Per PC-XT's comment, there is no prejudice against a reexamination of this redirect a few months hence. Thryduulf (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• All right good night → Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Unlikely search term as these were not the correct words, this quote is not mentioned at the target, see [2] - TheChampionMan1234 01:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: plausible search term. It is much easier to remember then any other details about missing flight. I don't think that missing comma makes any difference in this regard. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not really a plausible search term, since the misreporting was refuted. Unlikely that someone would search using the term because all they could remember of the reporting was a single phrase and not the airline, or the date of disappearance, or any of more natural searches. GraemeLeggett (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep for now per Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, with support for renomination in a few months. I expect the term will only become less used, and would support immediate deletion, except that I know people don't remember (or don't want to spell) Malaysian airlines, flight numbers, dates or other details that are less memorable to them, and use fleeting terms like this. —PC-XT+ 19:31, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep without prejudice to SinSQ800-805 nominating it for deletion themselves at any time. Thryduulf (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• User:SinSQ800-805/Singapore Airlines → Singapore Airlines (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Inappropriate redirect from article space. - TheChampionMan1234 00:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: absolutely appropriate redirect to article space from user space. SinSQ800-805 knows better whether this redirect is needed. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 00:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Question/Comment @Czarkoff: How on earth does this differ from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 24#User:Domfav/Windows XP? - TheChampionMan1234 04:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It does not. I regret that !vote. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral. SinSQ800-805 used this page to test edits to Singapore Airlines back in 2010 (see redirect's edit history). This redirect's value is questionable. However, I'm on the fence with this one due to the need to retain attributions. All and all, there are my thoughts, and I have no opinion regarding this redirect's fate. Steel1943 (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Italië → Italy (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 
• Itálie → Italy (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]

All of these languages aren't related to the target. - TheChampionMan1234 00:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 00:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. Unrelated to Afrikaans or Czech. Only Italie is a viable mispelling redirect. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of film festivals in South Korea. --BDD (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Seoul International Film Festival → Seoul (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

It redirects to Seoul, which has one sentence about the film industry (in the Museums section, not the Festivals one). That sentence does not mention the festival. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of film festivals in South Korea and tag with ((R with possibilities)): the list provides some context, and the subject does not seem notable ATM. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.