October 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 5, 2015.

Tollwut

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. -- Tavix (talk) 21:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of hospitals in Honduras

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The current target is inappropriate as there isn't such list there. Delete per WP:REDLINK to encourage creation. -- Tavix (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sports guru

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The discussion gradually moved towards the consensus that we should delete this redirect because it has an unhelpfully positive connotation. Deryck C. 00:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A coach is not by definition a guru. All hail the Hoodie, but would anybody in their right mind call Matt Millen a guru? Clarityfiend (talk) 07:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This comment was misplaced at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 24#Sports guru. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tripping Up Trump

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Search results without this redirect are useful anyway Scott Davis Talk 04:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was some sort of anti-Trump campaign after he bought a golf course in Scotland. The course is mentioned, but the campaign isn't, nor "Tripping Up Trump" in any other capacity. (The section it redirects to doesn't exist anymore.) It's mentioned at Michael Forbes (farmer) and The Trump Organization, but neither of those seem like good places to retarget. --BDD (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear from his article that he's even a member of that movement, though. --BDD (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

South African Antarctica

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to South African National Antarctic Programme. Scott Davis Talk 04:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a rather silly redirect, as South Africa doesn't have any territorial claims in Antarctica. -- Tavix (talk) 17:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, scratch that... let's go ahead with retarget to South African National Antarctic Programme as that's indeed helpful CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Classification of Products by Activity

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 October 12#Classification of Products by Activity

Template:Deletedprotected

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was The result of the discussion was Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, these redirects were formerly templates that were used to state that a page should not be recreated after they were deleted. However, after page creation protection was introduced, these templates were no longer necessary. As redirects, they are misleading WP:XNRs since deleted pages are not automatically subject to creation protection (and in Template:Deleteprotected's case, there is no such protection as "deletion protection.") Steel1943 (talk) 13:44, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Socially Awkward Penguin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recently-created redirect to a target which does not mention it. The meme might be notable (e.g. due to the image copyright claims by Getty, which have produced some RS coverage recently), in which case it should be deleted per WP:REDLINK. OTOH if it's not notable, we don't really have any other good target (though it does get a bare mention at 9GAG#Content). 210.6.254.106 (talk) 06:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC) (formerly 58.176.246.42)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Symone

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Simone (given name). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any connection, not sure about this. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 00:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I was thinking, but is it? (I am a Simon of course so I declare that special interest.) It's not at that target so perhaps that would be confusing to send it there, too, perhaps it is best deleted. I've never heard it used for or in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol. For example we have HTTP which I hope redirects there, but we don't have SYMONE. I was wondering also about Synonym which is a bit twisty and seems a long way out.... but offer it up just to rule it out. Si Trew (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article about Simony, but that seems a stretch too. I was expecting that to be a transliteration from Hebrew, but apparently isn't, so I learned something today... Si Trew (talk) 07:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.