The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• ŞARAP → Wine  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No affinity for Turkish. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 23:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 10:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Scooby scoobert doo → Scooby-Doo  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Laber□^T 23:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I do feel that some people might search for this as some do believe this is his full name.Ilikeguys21 (talk) 14:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - No action/rationale given, and seems appropriate. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The article explains that in one episode, Scooby's parents reveal that his real name is "Scoobert." Scoobert Doo also directs readers to Scooby-Doo, and I ultimately think that the extra "Scooby" at the front is harmless (see also Henry Jones, Jr., which directs readers to Indiana Jones). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 15:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep As no rationale was given for deletion, this should be immediately speedy kept. Also, redirect are cheap. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Stewie Just said that → Stewie Griffin  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Laber□^T 22:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• This can be deleted if you want. I should've figured no body would search this anyway.Ilikeguys21 (talk) 13:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, helpful to our readers. — Cirt (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cirt, can you elaborate? What does this mean? Know Your Meme has a page on it, but it's listed as rejected. --BDD (talk) 20:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - We don't need a redirect to a TV show character from individual jokes from that TV show when the article doesn't even mention it. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Also, if someone knows this joke, then they know Family Guy well enough to know Stewie's surname, so could just search for his actual name. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Microsoft Corp → Microsoft  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term, as there is only one quote (who would search with quotes anyway?) - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 22:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unlikely typo that is not useful. Meters (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Seems like a typo then creating a page, but regardless of where it came from it doesn't seem at all necessary. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:57, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete We don't need to account for every typo someone might possibly make. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation → NATO  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a valid synonym. Just a derogatory redirect that someone made up one day years ago. Edgeweyes (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete G10 attack page. Meters (talk) 22:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Same as above, and also not used by any reputable source 24.192.250.124 (talk) 23:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as offensive/abusive redirect --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)/Catalogs → Giant panda  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, redirect makes no sense. There aren't any "catalogs" mentioned at the target article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and WP:SUB#Disallowed uses.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since a panda is not a catalog. Steel1943 (talk) 01:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• McKinleynomics → William McKinley  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete this redirect as it is an irrelevant Simpsons joke not mentioned in the target. MelanieLamont (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Feminism#Criticism of feminism and anti-feminism. (I changed the section title. "Critique" sounds singular, and "Criticism" is more common here.) If Mduvekot's suggestion is carried out, the section redirect should be updated to #Criticism of feminism. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Criticism of feminism → Antifeminism  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is misleading. "Criticism of feminism" is not exactly the same as "ideological opposition to feminism". Criticizing feminism does not require being antifeminist. Delete to encourage article creation. sst✈ 16:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Feminism#Critique of feminism and anti-feminism as ((r to section)). While critique ≠ criticism in all cases, the content seems to fit alright in this case.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - While the nominator's point is a good one -- it's certainly not the same subject -- it does seem like a likely search term and the most appropriate target. The content of the "Critique of feminism and anti-feminism" section of the feminism article is more or less just antifeminism (and indeed points to that as the main article). In other words it doesn't actually offer much by way of criticism outside of antifeminism aside from mentioning a few people that criticize feminism while identifying as feminist (at least some of whom are often lumped in with antifeminism). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget. The solution is not to create a POV fork. Antifeminism shouldn't be the main article for Feminism#Critique_of_feminism_and_anti-feminism either. Split Feminism#Critique_of_feminism_and_anti-feminism into Feminism#Critique_of_feminism (without a main article) and Feminism#anti-feminism (with its own main article) and redirect to Feminism#Critique_of_feminism Mduvekot (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, current target is fine for our readers and editors to learn more about the extremely closely related topic, and per above it contains a good deal of information on the subject in the article it is pointing to at present. — Cirt (talk) 14:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Mduvekot. Kaldari (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to section per Godsy. There's already a ((main|anti-feminism)) at that section. Si Trew (talk) 04:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. MB298 (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• List of ICC Champions Trophy records → ICC Champions Trophy#Records  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Non notable redirect with nothing linking to it. Qed237 (talk) 11:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It actually redirects to ICC Champions Trophy#Records which list records, therefore it is a sensible redirect to a subtopic. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Without prejudice, I've added the section to the nom, and added ((R to section)) to the page, and courtesy comment at the target per WP:RSECT. Si Trew (talk) 04:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• ICC Champions Trophy hosts → ICC Champions Trophy#Tournament history  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Non notable redirect with nothing linking to it. Qed237 (talk) 11:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Redirects are cheap, and it does redirect to a sections mentioning who the hosts nations were. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Without prejudice, I've added the section title to the nom, tagged the page as ((R to section)), and commented at the target per WP:RSECT. The section could just be called "History", though. Si Trew (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. I'll retain the dab created by the IP, however, and move it to MVY (disambiguation). --BDD (talk) 21:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• MVY → Martha's Vineyard Airport  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Propose retargeting to Martha's Vineyard. I don't think "MVY" is a suitable WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to the airport. sst✈ 11:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I looked around, but I couldn't find anything in the Manual of Style (or any project-specific manuals of style) about conventions for International Air Transport Association airport codes. Because "MVY" is the code for Martha's Vineyard Airport, I think it's entirely plausible that readers will be looking for the airport. We may want to consider establishing some sort of uniform guideline about how to deal with airport abbreviations, though I think that most discussions about airport abbreviations will need to be decided on a case-by-case basis. LAX, for example, is commonly associated with Los Angeles International Airport, but readers who search for JFK will likely want to find information about John F. Kennedy, rather than John F. Kennedy International Airport. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as is, I believe it is more likely that readers looking "MVY" will want the airport, and it is connected to the regular Marhta's Vineyard article so potential to WP:Astonish is low. MelanieLamont (talk) 17:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - ((R from airport code)). I'm not terribly convinced about primary redirect either, but I'm less convinced that this needs to be fixed. Per MelanieLamont. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per both of the above. In most cases it seems like the airport code should point to the airport rather than the city/area it's in (unless there's a dab of course). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since MVY (disambiguation) doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 00:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate not only is this an airport, it is also an airline code for VIM-Aviaservice, and a language code for Maiya language -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have mocked up a dab page at the redirect for examination -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I am fine with a note to the page on the Martha's Vineyard Airport article. I believe it is still the primary topic, because the Maiya and VIM articles are stubby and do not get much views. MelanieLamont (talk) 15:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hera Pheri 3 (2016 film) → Hera Pheri 3  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Useless redirect. It redirects to an un-disambiguated title. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 06:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a valid ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)). Steel1943 (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Dell.se → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.ru → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.no → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.nl → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.jp → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.it → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.fr → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.eu → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.es → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.dk → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.ve → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.sg → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.pr → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.pa → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.my → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.mx → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.hk → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.cn → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.br → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.com.au → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.co.uk → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.co.kr → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.co.in → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.cl → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.ch → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.ca → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.be → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dell.at → Dell  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible search terms, not an official or affiliated domain name. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Dellete per my comments at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 29#Airfrance.ae. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Dude, you're getting a delete! - per Tavix, and the previous discussions. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all If you're searching with any of these terms, you should consider what you're doing with your life, and just search Dell instead. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was reverse redirect. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 10:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Educational institution → Types of educational institutions  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:REDLINK We do not have a article on this general topic, similar to the Space program nomination. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Reverse the redirect. The article is about educational institutions, so it should be titled that way. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Reverse the redirect per Tavix. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Reverse the redirect, as above. Types of educational institution also targets there (among others); I don't know why people think that "types of x" needs to be "types of xs". Si Trew (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• SIP COMMUNICATOR → Jitsi  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fails WP:RCAPS. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RCAPS is a "common outcome", not a policy or guideline. A redirect can neither "pass" nor "fail" it. Si Trew (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Valid, helpful redirect as I can certainly see someone thinking that the jargon terms have to be capitalized CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.