The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Big Ariana → Ariana Grande  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Huh? -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A quick Google search- both with and without quotation marks- doesn't seem to indicate that this is a plausible nickname or stage name for her. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 23:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 00:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Seems to be some portmanteau of her and Big Sean, but not mentioned anywhere in reliable sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "Ariana Grande", if translated literally, means "Big Ariana" in Spanish. That doesn't make this a useful redirect. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as per Rosguill. -- CptViraj (📧) 03:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I have never heard or seen this phrase used in connection with Grande or any of her music. Aoba47 (talk) 01:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C6H5COOHNa → Sodium_benzoate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C6H5COOHNa was created by mistake: formula of Sodium_benzoate is C6H5COONa. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₆H₅COOHNa. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 22:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom Hughesdarren (talk) 23:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Thanks for your help, Zoolver! -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Rooster's Son Publishing → Jerry Cantrell  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target. While "Rooster" is/was a nickname for Cantrell's father, there's no mention of publishing anywhere in the target. An internet search turned up a Genius.com account with this name but nothing else. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep That's Cantrell's current publisher listed on Alice in Chains' latest albums and on the SESAC and ASCAP databases, like Buttnugget Publishing and Boggy Bottom Publishing were in the past and have their own redirects here even though they're not mentioned in the target. Zoolver (talk) 01:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• https://i.imgur.com/PaSoqPC.jpg
• https://www.sesac.com/#/repertory/search?term=rooster's%20son%20publishing&category=publisher&page=1
• https://www.ascap.com/repertory#ace/search/publisher/rooster%27s%20son%20publishing
• https://www.ascap.com/repertory#ace/search/publisher/rooster%27s%20son/performer/alice%20in%20chains

• Zoolver, similar to the below discussion, would you be willing to add such content? Those other companies aren't necessarily good examples. When the relationship isn't extremely obvious, redirects without mention can confuse and mislead readers. If I was generally familiar with Rooster's Son Publishing and wanted to learn more, this redirect would suggest that Wikipedia could help me in that regard, but I would almost certainly be disappointed by the status quo. --BDD (talk) 18:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BDD: Done.[1]. Zoolver (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Thanks to Zoolver, the company is now mentioned at the article with sources. --BDD (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. In case it matters, I'll note that both people have pages now. Feel free to recreate or restore this redirect should this gain a mention somewhere. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• A Boy and His Dinosaur → List of All Elite Wrestling personnel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target, I can't fathom the purpose of this redirect and would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This is a tag team name used by two people from the List of All Elite Wrestling personnel. Since it involves two people (Luchasaurus and Jungle Boy (wrestler)), and only one of them has a page, I believe Austin_Matelson#All_Elite_Wrestling_(2019–present) should be the target. Information on the team should be added to that section. - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 16:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Relisting comment: I see there still isn't a mention at the suggested retarget section. Galatz, would you be willing to add something there? -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete since it's not a helpful redirect as things stand now, but I could easily flip on this if we get a good mention somewhere. --BDD (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Inside the Montreal Screw Job: Who Really Got Screwed in the WWE? → Montreal Screwjob  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

delete, the target does not contain a reference to this odd title. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Note that the nominated term is actually the title of a book about the "Montreal Screwjob" incident (see [2]). That particular book does not have a Wikipedia article. But see also this redirect [3] and this redirect [4] for other media products on the incident. Note sure how those precedents apply to the redirect in this nomination, perhaps all three should be addressed. This all shows that wrestling fans use the term "Montreal Screwjob" in many different ways. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete until there's an article on the book. 99.99% of the folks I know aren't going type that big long statement in to get to the much simpler to type Montreal Screwjob. If they are really searching for the book - then better to give them a search result and choice of reading material. I know we have a TON of redirects for very silly things because "redirects are cheap" - but just because WP:OTHERSTUFF exists doesn't mean it should or this should. — Ched (talk) 01:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Put On Your Pants & Jacket! → Take Off Your Pants and Jacket  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A hoax and not a plausible search term. A Google search turns up zero results for any such "compilation album" under this name (and as it is purported to be by Blink-182, there would be coverage if it existed). The editor who created it has created at least one other hoax album that I have nominated for deletion (Misdemeanor (Missy Elliott album)). Ss112 15:36, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The nominator's reasoning is correct. This term originated as a hoax article on an album that does not exist. And since it does not exist, the title is not a plausible search term that needs to be redirected to the band's page or anywhere else. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Aoba47 (talk) 01:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above — Ched (talk) 01:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoaxes are implausible redirects. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. Appears uncontroversial. --BDD (talk) 18:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest, 1984 European Cup Semi-Final → 1984 European Cup Final#Route to the final  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This should target to Liverpool vs. Dinamo Bucharest (1983–84 European Cup semi-final), but the redirect is fully protected so I can't edit it. Robofish (talk) 11:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On further examination, it seems an article on the semi-final was previously deleted in 2011 and the redirect was protected after that; but a new article was created in 2014, and nobody's tried to delete it again since then. It certainly looks to me like it passes the notability test, at least. Robofish (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Chisapani, Bardiya → Chisapani, Banke  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not the same subject, my guess would be that there is a locale named Chisapani in Bardiya. However, if so it should stay a redlink until an article can be created, as it does not appear to be related to the current target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 08:35, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Maggie (politician) → Margaret Thatcher  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Possibly ambiguous. Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 06:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - while Margaret Thatcher is well known in the UK as 'Maggie', there must be other politicians by that name as well. Robofish (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete at least Tricky dick has a modifier for his name. — Ched (talk) 01:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I suppose, since it's brought up. There are no incoming links, and if there's ever any need for one an editor probably won't know this redirect exists and will just write "[[Margaret Thatcher|Maggie]]", which will also be clearer to future editors. Herostratus (talk) 13:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.