The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Indian Local Dialects → Languages of India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous redirect (which Indian?), no relevant content at target. – Uanfala (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Fucking. Early closure per snowball clause. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• F**king → Fucking, Austria  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This bowdlerization could also mean the continuous form of "fuck". So I propose to disambiguate it. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 14:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Fucking. PC78 (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Fucking per PC78. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 15:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Fucking, as this censored version is commonly used to substitute the present progressive but never the proper noun. ComplexRational (talk) 21:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Sheldon James Plankton → Plankton and Karen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While plenty of use comes from Sheldon J. Plankton, and I can theoretically see the use here, the middle name of James is at best unsourced. Middle name not mentioned in the target. (Only middle inital) James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 10:59, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 09:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• WikiProject Indian cities → Template:WikiProject Indian_cities  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• WikiProject Indian states → Template:WikiProject_Indian_states  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 August 6#All cross-namespace redirects of the following type. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:49, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. The recently created wrapper templates are of dubious value themsleves and were incorrectly created in article space. No good reason to keep these cross-namespace redirects. PC78 (talk) 04:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per PC78. Wug·a·po·des​ 05:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 10:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 15:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Camp Men-O-Lan → General Conference Mennonite Church  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect was created after my nomination to delete the article was successful. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Men-O-Lan. This redirect serves no purpose as it is broad and is never mentioned in the article at all. The target article does not even have the word "Camp" in it. AmericanAir88^(talk) 00:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep One of the proposals was to redirect and place the content in the target article. I'm not sure why that didn't happen. I thought that the camp was notable. In any case, restore the article long enough to salvage the text, and I'll place it in the target article. --evrik ^(talk) 01:03, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can find the article text at a WikiMirror ([1]). -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Text added. --evrik ^(talk) 16:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment not sure which article it should point to as there are multiple ones for Mennonites, including Mennonite Church (1683–2002) and Mennonite Church USA. There are articles about the camp such as "Parents Forgo Soccer Camp For Summer With Religion". WSJ. but other stuff is local and routine such as bus accident "23 hurt as Pennsylvania school bus overturns on Interstate 81 near Chambersburg". or kid who drowned "10-YEAR-OLD DROWNS AT CAMP IN MILFORD". Morning Call. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:48, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I think the artilce could have been kept. Right now, just focusing on the redirect. --evrik ^(talk) 16:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.