The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wall of the Sun and Wall of the Moon. (non-admin closure) Kori (@) 18:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wall of the Sun → Middle-earth#Geography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Incredibly obscure Tolkien concept. Not mentioned anywhere, no WP:ATT issues with deletion. Retarget to Wall of the Sun and Wall of the Moon or delete, whichever is viewed to be more appropriate. Hog Farm (talk) 18:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I agree. This isn't really worth mentioning anywhere. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wall of the Sun and Wall of the Moon. No reason not to. Note that the article describes two works of art, one of which is actually called Wall of the Sun. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Wall of the Sun and Wall of the Moon per BDD. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wall of the Sun and Wall of the Moon. There's even a photo of Wall of the Sun in the infobox. Narky Blert (talk) 14:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget - Changed my mind. Yes, this should go over to the aforementioned article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Xander's ligament → Median umbilical ligament  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Xander's ligaments → Median umbilical ligament  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Neologism created by a YouTuber that subsequently made its way into a peer-reviewed journal article. See [1]. gobonobo ^{+ c} 20:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This name also spread to other materials ("a textbook [and] a medical curriculum" according to the BuzzFeed article), and so may be a plausible search term for readers using those sources. I'm not sure if that's a strong enough reason to keep these. Glades12 (talk) 15:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete. The others' comments have swayed me. Glades12 (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Counter-comment - strong delete. This is NOT a strong enough reason to keep this. I originally noted this (see our WikiProject Anatomy archives: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy/Archive_11#And_so_it_begins). There are millions of journal articles and teaching slides out there and by preserving this we are doing the world a disservice and incentivising the (probably humorously intentioned, but still not in line with our goals) behaviour of the original prankster. These should be deleted. --Tom (LT) (talk) 09:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both - Wikipedia shouldn't legitimatize nonsense. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Early English. Ruslik_Zero 20:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Early English language → Early Modern English  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Early english → Early Modern English  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous term, could also refer to Old English. Searching on Google Scholar, virtually all use of this phrase was to refer to "early English language learning" or contextually-early translations of texts. I would suggest deletion. Contrast against Early English (1500-1700), which is not a terribly likely search term but at least is unambiguous. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both - I agree. The ambiguity makes these unhelpful. 71.170.209.55 (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• There's a dab page at Early English – for as long as it exists, the two redirects should point there. – Uanfala (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Uanfala. --JBL (talk) 13:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to DAB page Early English as ((r from incomplete disambiguation)). Narky Blert (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak oppose retargeting the first one. The proposed new target only lists one language besides see also's (and nothing about learning/translating English), so the nominator's concern would still apply. No opinion regarding the second. Glades12 (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I was under the impression that in those uses, the term was a partial match: "early English learning" is the early learning of English, not the learning of Early English. – Uanfala (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget both to Early English. — J947 ^[cont] 21:19, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Early English. Use the disam page because it exists.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 20:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 20:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mario Morrison → John Wayne  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible search term, a misspelling of Wayne's relatively obscure birth name. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, changes the name complete, this could be a whole other person. Hog Farm (talk) 22:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Implausible misspelling which makes him look like an Italian plumber. Narky Blert (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 20:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• EHPAD → Nursing home care  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. EHPAD appears to refer to a French palliative care institute (frWiki article). The acronym is mentioned in a few scattered places in English Wikipedia, but there isn't a good redirect target. I would suggest deletion in order to encourage article creation. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to encourage article creation per nom. At first glance, there's plenty of meat in the French article to justify translation, and there could be a dozen links-in from existing English articles. Narky Blert (talk) 14:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. WP:REDLINK appears to apply here. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was No consensus. Retargeting the first one per a suggestion that is preferable to keeping, but the discussion itself was no consensus across the board. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Paracel Islands/Transnational issues → Paracel Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Paracel Islands/Military → Paracel Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Paracel Islands/Economy → Paracel Islands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another old R from subpage without any mention in the target article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the histories as historical, but I'm not opposed to a retarget where possible. — J947 ^[cont] 20:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Paracel Islands/Transnational issues to Paracel_Islands#Territorial_disputes_and_their_historical_background as that redirect was an ((R from move)) to this. — J947 ^[cont] 01:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is no useful page history. DrKay (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget /Economy to Palmyra Atoll#Economy, no consensus for the other two _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Palmyra Atoll/Transportation → Palmyra Atoll  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Palmyra Atoll/People → Palmyra Atoll  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Palmyra Atoll/Economy → Palmyra Atoll  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Old R from subpage, but there is no information given on the topic. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the histories as historical, but I'm not opposed to a retarget where possible. — J947 ^[cont] 20:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Palmyra Atoll/Economy to Palmyra Atoll#economy. — J947 ^[cont] 01:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Tavix had made Palmyra Atoll#Economy a section, so retarget to the uppercase version. — J947 ^[cont] 02:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is no useful page history. DrKay (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Refine Palmyra Atoll/Economy to Palmyra Atoll#Economy per J947 (people might be looking for that specific section), but delete the others as the article doesn't explain anything about its demographics or transportation. Regards, SONIC678 14:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – from K4: Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including CamelCase links and old subpage links, should be left alone in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. Palmyra Atoll/Transportation is from May 2001 and is harmless; there is no reason whatsoever to delete the history on any of these redirects. — J947 ^[cont] 02:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Anti-fooball → Anti-football  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• U.S. fooball team → United States national football team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Earl Evans (American fooball) → Earl Evans (American football)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Vince Hill (American fooball) → Vince Hill (American football)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of North Dakota State University Bison head fooball coaches → List of North Dakota State Bison head football coaches  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Ukraine national fooball team → Ukraine national football team  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kansas Shrine Bowl All-Star Fooball Game → Kansas Shrine Bowl  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• József Varga (fooballer, born 1999) → József Varga (footballer, born 1999)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Tang Shi (fooballer) → Tang Shi (footballer)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Line Jensen (fooballer) → Line Sigvardsen Jensen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Firmansyah (fooballer born 1984) → Firmansyah (footballer, born 1984)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Most of these eleven were left over from page moves to the correct spellings, and they don't seem to get very many pageviews now, regardless if we've ever seen or even been fooballers footballers. Regards, SONIC678 19:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - We shouldn't keep any of these. They're not really useful. Deletion is totally the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 12:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all as helpful and unambiguous, nothing is to be gained by deleting these redirects. Stop ignoring K4 and RHARMFUL please. — J947 ^[cont] 21:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all due to their misspelled disambiguators, and especially since Fooball, Fooballer, and Fooballers have never existed (and should never exist) on the English Wikipedia, proving these to not be a likely or plausible misspellings. Steel1943 (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all. Unnecessary clutter, useless junk. Steel1943 makes a good point about the unlikeliness of these misspellings. Narky Blert (talk) 18:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Coprologies → Scatology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Scatologies → Scatology  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Neelix creation of an unlikely plural. We don't have biologies either. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks like these two were meant to be combined, since the "Coprologies" nomination had no statement. I've combined them. --BDD (talk) 19:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Made-up words. Narky Blert (talk) 09:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both as somewhat helpful and unambiguous, nothing is to be gained by deleting these redirects. — J947 ^[cont] 21:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to New Kids on the Blecch. Nomination withdrawn, found a mention with the correct spelling, and the misspelling is plausible. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm (talk) 18:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Party Possy → List of The Simpsons characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned anywhere, appears to be a minor plot element not worth mentioning anywhere. Hog Farm (talk) 17:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wild honeys → Wild Honey  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target doesn't contain any entries which could be in the plural (only proper names), potentially making this redirect misleading. Glades12 (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as helpful; it could be a literal search for the disambig page, i.e. a search of all the things Wild honey could refer to – the Wild honeys. — J947 ^[cont] 21:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - It seems like a plausible error to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. This was obviously not in good faith and I deleted it. Killiondude (talk) 17:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• User:BoomerCure → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary WP:CNR. Not generated from a page move. Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This redirect can range from useless to harmful for editors trying to contact the user. --MarioGom (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As stated above, this isn't appropriate at all. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Pointless redirect in the userspace of a user who was indeffed for WP:NOTHERE. We don't need this. Hog Farm (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Coronapocalypse → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See the RfDs of Covidiot, Condemic, COVIDemic, etc. Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Unlike other terms, this one seems to have some significant usage online, see here for an academic example. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Despite the amusing adoption in one academic source, this is still ridiculous as per usual. References to the world ending, or warfare, are inappropriate. -- Pingumeister^(talk) 16:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete. Made me smile, nice troll. Iluvalar (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete amusing but obscure neologism at best --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Walmart Connect → Walmart  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention in article Tsla1337 (talk) 11:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm not sure what this term even refers to. Searching generates varying things relating to Walmart without a clear focus. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Searching brought up "Buy Connect at Walmart", "Buy Connect 4 at Walmart", and an essentially incomprehensible Urban Dictionary entry. Hog Farm (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Japaleno → Jalapeño  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible misspelling; had 19 pageviews in the past 90 days compared to 98597 for its target. One of the many questionable redirects created by J4lambert (talk · contribs). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This just isn't helpful. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The swapping of two syllables in the middle of a long word, which is not much known in half of the English-speaking world? Looks plausible to me. – Uanfala (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Uanfala. Definitely helpful and useless to delete. — J947 ^[cont] 20:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Creator request. Hut 8.5 21:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• USC Upstate Spartans basbeall → USC Upstate Spartans  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While I can see someone searching "basball" (which seems sort of plausible), I'm not sure someone would search "basbeall," which seems less plausible... Regards, SONIC678 03:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Well, this seems useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (as redirect creator) - I agree, bad typo. SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Tony Harris (baskeball player) → Tony Harris  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Baskeball Palace of Mid-America → Bud Walton Arena  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Erebuni Cedars Baskeball → Yerevan BC  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Whether or not we've played baskeball basketball, I'm not sure if this is a plausible misspelling, which seems to be why the second and third were moved to their current titles (the first started out as a duplicate article in 2006 before being blanked and redirected three months later to the correctly spelled counterpart, which is now also a redirect to its target). What to do with these? Regards, SONIC678 03:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - They're not really helpful. Let's simply be rid of these. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete all unambiguous errors. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all as helpful and unambiguously referring to their current targets, nothing is to be gained by deleting these redirects – especially with K4 and RHARMFUL advising against it. — J947 ^[cont] 21:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all due to their misspelled disambiguators, and especially since Baskeball has never existed (and should never exist) on the English Wikipedia, proving this to not be a likely or plausible misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Early SNOW close. You may also think of it as CSD R3. Killiondude (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• World War III (2020) → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

World War III (2020)? It's too soon to have this redirect. MarioGom (talk) 00:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this fits any of the criterion for a redirect. Nobody refers to pandemics as world wars. Nmurali02 01:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Kinda ridiculous, actually, that this would even exist. oknazevad (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, definitely too soon for a World War III, also we don't have World War I (1914) or World War II (1939), further invalidating this. Regards, SONIC678 02:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. No good reason for this to exist. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no evidence that COVID19 will cause a World War.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 03:52, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't really think I need an explanation for my delete opinion Zoozaz1 (talk)
• Delete A pandemic is not World War III. Creator J4lambert (talk · contribs) has an extensive history of questionable redirects. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, the pandemic is not WWIII, isn't called WWIII, and any pageviews are likely from this very RfD. >>BEANS X2t 09:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pandemic ≠ World war. Purplneon486 (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Absolutely ridiculous comparison. Neither the numbers of dead nor the risk of dying if you catch the virus are anywhere near what was seen during the two world wars (risk of death during a major operation like Stalingrad or D-Day). 192.121.232.253 (talk) 11:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow – There is a clear consensus to delete this redirect. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:R3. Let's be rid of this as soon as possible. Hog Farm (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a hoax. Natureium (talk) 16:59, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow delete. Glades12 (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Stay home, save life → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are some T-shirts and stickers with this slogan but... do we really want this redirect? MarioGom (talk) 00:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Implausible that anyone would type this or that it would become a notable topic. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Useless. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Same as below. This is not a plausible search term or link. Natureium (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to social distancing a la stay the fuck home. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This exact string is not a plausible search term. Hog Farm (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Like a good neighbor stay over there → 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are some T-shirts and stickers with this slogan but... do we really want this redirect? MarioGom (talk) 00:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Keep per WP:CHEAP, unless there is a better target. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Implausible that anyone would type this or that it would become a notable topic. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is not a plausible search term. If I did find this link, I would expect it to redirect to State Farm. Natureium (talk) 01:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Natureium. ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 07:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to social distancing a la stay the fuck home. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 12:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Uber pwnd → Pwn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article Tsla1337 (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Should be added then. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Given that "uber" essentially means "mega", "super", "ultra", et cetera a lot of the time, basically every term used in internet conversation can have an "uber" attached to it for emphasis. "Uber crazy" and "uber embarrassing" come to mind immediately. Keeping this redirect opens up a big can of worms. This isn't really encyclopedic, anyways. Deletion seems to be the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per CWM. Narky Blert (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.