< August 10
August 12 >

August 11

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 11, 2020.

Cup Foods

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This was speedy deleted and then discussed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 August 4 where the consensus was to relist. This is a purely administrative action on my part; I am neutral. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reason it's plausible is because a lot of people who use en.wiki don't have English as their first language. The people who write Google Books, though, are fluent.—S Marshall T/C 16:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • People who don't speak English well, or who are deliberately trying to come up with fanciful interpretations, could misinterpret nearly any phrase as an alternative name for something. "Undersea boat" could mean a shipwreck (a boat that's now underseas because it sunk); "free masonry" could mean Habitat for Humanity (volunteers performing masonry work for free). However, WP:DABMENTION means that dab pages consist only of phrases that actually appear on target articles, while WP:V and WP:WEIGHT and WP:NOTDIC mean that target articles only contain synonyms that are verifiable and widely-used in reliable sources. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 04:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LM2F

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see no known uses of this abbreviation for the target via a Google search. LMTF appears to be the established shortcut for the band. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Firetruck distance

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Taxicab geometry" does not mention about a firetruck or a firetruck distance path. Seventyfiveyears at 19:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Liquidation of the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I've always been under the impression that liquidation and dissolution are not exactly synonyms. Hog Farm Bacon 18:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Imola Grand Prix

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. In the absence of anyone advocating for keeping the status quo, a dab page seems like the best compromise. I'm going to go ahead and implement 5225c's draft signed, Rosguill talk 15:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There have been Imola Grand Prix (this is a redirect from incorrect name). The 1963 Imola Grand Prix for example which was apparently the 4th Imola Grand Prix. This redirect is therefore misleading. Recommending deletion.
SSSB (talk) 11:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too concerned, I created the redirect as we did for Styrian GP → 2020 Styrian GP because the table on the 2020 season article had that as the name. I don't think it's misleading per se because it is a possible search term for the Grand Prix, like the Steiermark GP, but I can understand why it isn't suitable.
5225C (talk • contributions) 12:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I say its misleading because it implies that this is the only Imola Grand Prix (or the only Grand Prix which can be referred to as such, correctly or incorrectly) which is simply untrue.
SSSB (talk) 12:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point. I would then support retargeting it to either List of Grand Prix held at Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari as suggested by Thryduulf or simply redirecting to Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari as suggested by Narky Blert. Preferably the former as I've now seen the redirect linked to from some of the previous Imola races.
5225C (talk • contributions) 01:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I dispute the fact that the primary topic of Imola Grand Prix is San Marino Grand Prix as it was never known as that and I have never seen a source which calls it that.
    SSSB (talk) 07:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, I stand corrected, sourced do call it that. But I am still not convinced its the primary topic.
    SSSB (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
At a minimum it really ought to mention the races actually called the Imola Grand Prix. I would still prefer deletion though. A7V2 (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"Riverside Community Hospital"

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target (and likely is the name of multiple hospitals, given how common the city name Riverside is. Delete unless a sourced mention can be added. signed, Rosguill talk 16:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Redirect was made last month and there's no explanation of the redirect. I think regardless of source, your argument of it applying to multiple hospitals would be valid. I thought this was about a hospital in Florida. – The Grid (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jain Baniya

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target: searching on Google Scholar and internally on Wikipedia suggests that this is the name of a specific caste category, but we don't have any information about it beyond labeling a few individuals as such. It was previously created as an unsourced 1-sentence stub, which hardly seems appropriate to revert back to, and it's not clear from search results that this is notable. I would suggest deletion in the absence of a better solution. signed, Rosguill talk 16:16, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ploo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. Redirect created in 2013 as an "upcoming production", but doesn't look like Ploo even exists Joseph2302 (talk) 15:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kienspan

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 20#Kienspan

Wikipedia:BOTTOMUP

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing. The guideline says to put new topics at the bottom of the page, which means that in chronological order of OP they appear from the top down—so this is the exact opposite of what the guideline says. YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • It seemed like a sensible redirect at the time. Although if people find it confusing, delete it. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zahed Haseeb

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target article. Not clear how they would be connected. —Bagumba (talk) 09:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Straight virginity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could also refer to heterosexuals who are virgins. Hog Farm Bacon 05:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add: Regarding the "a straight virgin is someone who hasn't had straight sex" commentary below, it's similar to people saying that they are anal virgins because they've never engaged in anal sex. But I would expect to see sources using the wording straight virginity (not the few fiction books on Google Books using it), and in the context of lesbians, before saying that it should redirect to the section in question. The wording is ambiguous because it can be seen as referring to either a heterosexual virgin or someone who hasn't engaged in heterosexual sex. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heterosexual virginity

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This could also refer to heterosexuals who are virgins, so this probably shouldn't be specifically targeted to just the lesbian page. Hog Farm Bacon 05:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add: Regarding the "a heterosexual virgin is someone who hasn't had heterosexual sex" commentary, it's similar to people saying that they are anal virgins because they've never engaged in anal sex. But I would expect to see sources using the wording heterosexual virginity (like a couple of academic books on Google Books do), and in the context of lesbians, before saying that it should redirect to the section in question. The wording is ambiguous because it can be seen as referring to either a heterosexual virgin or someone who hasn't engaged in heterosexual sex. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Deep Stroker II

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, presumably a model name for a minor product. Hog Farm Bacon 05:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

RoboSuck

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. I'm assuming this is a product, but I don't really want to have this in my browser history to confirm that. Hog Farm Bacon 05:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Animal Genocidists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. A Google search mostly brings up results for some video game in-game achievement. Hog Farm Bacon 05:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Friut

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. It is WP:SNOWing. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 13:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unlikely misspelling; only 12 hits in the last month. Ghinga7 (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Typhoon Kathleen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect from draft to mainspace, then why it should be kept? SMB​99​thx Email! 01:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

STFU n00b!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article "Internet slang" does not mention anything about the "STFU noob" slang. Seventyfiveyears at 01:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More