< November 17
November 19 >

November 18

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 18, 2020.

More (upcoming "film name") redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete WP:SNOW. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those films were already released, so why would they still be upcoming? Delete those per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 9#Upcoming redirects. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Thought Wrong

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, this redirects to Love Me Now?, but there is also an album track with the same name on Thankful (Kelly Clarkson album). Neither appear to be notable enough for their own articles. There is not a clear redirect target for this since there are two songs with the same name on two different albums. Aoba47 (talk) 22:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Makes sense to me. Thank you for the comment. Aoba47 (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ss112: Would it be preferable to somehow withdraw this discussion to create the dab or to leave this up for further discussion? I am not used to redirects for discussion so I am not really sure on the protocol for this kind of situation. Aoba47 (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Aoba47: It's up to you. You're allowed to withdraw your nomination, especially if there's not much of a discussion or it's not progressing with more and more users commenting (as there doesn't really seem to be at present). Ss112 09:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the responses. I have never really worked with drafts so I am not too experienced in that area. I would like to withdraw this, and I will make the dab over the weekend. Would I have to do anything special to withdraw this or would just posting on here that I would like to withdraw this be enough? Aoba47 (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Greater Bay Area

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Most participants feel this is comfortably the primary topic for the specific phrase with "Greater", and it's hatnoted appropriately. A requested move would be recommended if there's an inclination to move the target to this title. ~ mazca talk 00:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area be the primary topic? This was a redirect to the Chinese one as of 2019. Prior to that, it was a redirect to Bay Area (disambiguation). Posting on behalf of editor who has COI on the article. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Posting on behalf of Fidan160. I have no 🐶 in this RFD. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Eureka Lott, sorry, I should clarify. Should Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area be renamed to Greater Bay Area? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. That sounds like a subject for a WP:RM, no? - Eureka Lott 17:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's a matter for WP:RM. Thryduulf (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is even more confusing. I only know of one place called "Bay Area" - the San Francisco Bay Area, where I live. I'd say support disambiguation. Aasim (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your inputs. So far, I haven't come across with 'Greater Bay Area' term referring to another bay area, only to this one. Just recently another White Paper about Greater Bay Area has been released by Merck China, please follow it here https://www.merckgroup.com/content/dam/web/corporate/images/country-specifics/china/st-attachment/white-paper/Guangdong-Hong%20Kong-Macao%20Greater%20Bay%20Area%20Innovation%20Ecosystem%20White%20Paper.pdf. I will start updating the page nevertheless and if in the process there is a consensus to change the title of the page, then we do it. Thanks! Fidan160 (talk) 09:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

La Conquete

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Really more of a no consensus, but since no one argued in favor of the status quo, disambiguation is a more suitable outcome. signed, Rosguill talk 23:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simply French for "The Conquest". War of the Conquest seems to be a clear redirect for this conflict, but searching suggests that this shorter phrase is just too vague. Hog Farm Bacon 20:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Authoritazation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a neologism. Results on Google Scholar and the internet appear to predominantly be typos of "authorization". Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2016-19 West Libya clashes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25#2016-19 West Libya clashes

Sound Wave

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Soundwave. Weak consensus for this, with no prejudice against renominating this page alongside similar redirects for a more thorough discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 23:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At this capitalisation, this redirect should target disambiguation page Soundwave. Note that Sound wave and Sound waves both correctly target Sound. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This one had 3 links-in. All 3 were unnecessarily complicated (they were simply about sound). All had been piped as [[Sound Wave|sound wave]]. Narky Blert (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Main Page

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by Iridescent per WP:G2. (non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears (talk) 18:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was just created 2 months ago and it's actually not a draft article. Also, drafts should normally not redirect to main namespace. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Upcoming racing video games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of upcoming games at the target, delete unless someone intends to significantly change the scope of the target article signed, Rosguill talk 17:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Balghat Polytechnic College, Rudha

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25#Balghat Polytechnic College, Rudha

Masanori Andoh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted. It is for a non-notable Japanese baseball player drafted by the Lions in 1997, however I cannot find any English-language information on him and per the ja:安藤正則 he never even played for its "major league" team, only its farm team. --TorsodogTalk 05:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Toshitaka Enomotoh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects should be deleted. They are for a non-notable Japanese baseball player drafted by the Hawks in 2003, however I cannot find any English-language information on him and per the ja:榎本敏孝 he never even played for its "major league" team, only its farm team. --TorsodogTalk 05:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Resilient (Tiesto Remix) (Song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Resilient (Tiesto Remix)" is a plausible search term; "Resilient (Tiesto Remix) (Song)" is not (CC) Tbhotch™ 02:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

制服

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ordinary dictionary word meaning "uniform" in three different languages (see wikt:制服). It doesn't just mean school uniforms either, but covers any kind of uniforms including military uniforms, work uniforms, etc. Therefore it's not appropriate as a redirect to one kind of uniform in one country which uses this term, and it seems rather dubious to create a ((Chinese title disambiguation)) at this lemma either. The best solution is either ((Wiktionary redirect)) or deletion. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 01:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More