December 26

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 26, 2022.

Russian invasion of Ukraine

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 3#Russian invasion of Ukraine

Quantity of electricity

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Quantity of electricity

Front hole

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Transgender sexuality#Transgender men 2. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Target article does not use this term. Would suggest instead targeting Transgender sexuality § Transgender men 2, which does. (The one issue I see with this is that the vagina / front hole is not only relevant in the context of sexuality, but the solution to that would be to break Anatomical terminology among transgender people out into its own article, which could be done at a later date; this could then be summarily retargeted.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Social networking 2.0

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the target article and the redirect unclear. However, the target article does mention Web 2.0 a few times, and it seems it may be somewhat synonymous to the redirect, so possibly weak retarget to Web 2.0, but "weak" since the redirect technically isn't mentioned there either, thus delete world probably be the best option. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Macaulay Culkon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned either at the current target or the original target Bender Should Not Be Allowed on TV. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Social network creation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the use of the word "creation" in this redirect, it may not be clear what this redirect is meant to refer. There is the section Social network#History this discusses how the concept of "social network" began, but there is also the section Social networking service#History with similar information. Given the vagueness and lack of clarity about what this redirect is meant to refer (possibly creating a new social network(ing service)?), I think delete is the best route to take to allow search results to better serve readers. However, this redirect is a ((R with history)) that was an article for over a year from 2007 to 2008, but then was subject to a WP:BLAR. Steel1943 (talk) 21:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It could also mean installing the service. Probably delete due to bad style, ambigious name. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Electronic sociability

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target or Social network, leaving the connection between the redirect and either of the respective targets unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too specific, I recommend Mediated communication instead. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Digix

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Digix

Brainwallet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cryptocurrency wallet#Wallets. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It may be possible to add a mention to Cryptocurrency wallet and retarget the current redirect there. ([1]) Carpimaps (talk) 11:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No mention has been added to Cryptocurrency wallet yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Taihoku County

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 5#Taihoku County

The Royalty Tour (Mary J. Blige and Nas Tour)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restored article and sent to AfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an WP:XY issue, although they are billed co-headliners of the tour, why the article is BLARed without discussing the outcome. Either the issue as you get the WP:PT, the harder you get, the way you've pass or fail the NTOUR which they've been co-headliners. I'm open to restore article and bring this to AFD, so the discussion could be broadened. I will tag Dylanvt, the BLARrer to formally speak out on BLARring the co-headlining tour and TartarTorte to apply the similar opinion on how co-headliners are redirected to the artist page without discussing to RFD 2600:1700:9BF3:220:88E:619E:9003:4C6E (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know where it should be redirected, but the article certainly doesn't pass WP:NTOUR. I'm more or less neutral about what to do with it as long as it's not maintained as a standalone article. Wikipedia has a big (though I'll admit not crucial) problem with non-notable concert tour articles. Dylanvt (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Diffuse term

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 21:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The word "term" is not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target subject unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steel1943 The section of "A lightwarp is a technique of which an object in the geometrical world refracts light based on the direction and intensity of the light. The light is then warped using an ambient diffuse term with a range of the color spectrum." It is mentioned in the article. Des Vallee (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure enough it is. I was originally just thinking of retargeting this redirect to Computer graphics lighting#Lightwarp after discovering it is mentioned: However, it doesn't seem really clear that the phrase "diffuse term" is defined very well in the target article, meaning it could have a definition exclusive of what is already present in the article. Steel1943 (talk) 00:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 06:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Refined oil

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Refined oil

Eashoa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Yeshua. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target. It seems to be a modern reconstruction attempting at pronouncing "Jesus" as it was pronounced back in the 1st century. I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 19:31, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Porridge (TV series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Porridge (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous; see Porridge (2016 TV series). Retarget to Porridge (disambiguation). 162 etc. (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Very clear primary redirect. Far more significant than the later sequel. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A 2019 RM determined that partial disambiguation should not be used for this series (although I note that you opposed that in the discussion.) 162 etc. (talk) 17:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We're not talking about moving the article! We're talking about a primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If Porridge (TV series) and Porridge (1974 TV series) are the same article, there's no reason to keep the excessive disambiguation in the title. However, the RM determined that the title should be disambiguated. 162 etc. (talk) 01:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brandon Roberts (musician)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 2#Brandon Roberts (musician)